Using Systems Methods for Systemic Problems

A Case Study of Poor Lawyer Wellbeing

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6423936
AutoresMatt Healey (0000-0002-9618-6123, First Person Consulting, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Marshal N Miller, Madelinne Miller (0009-0009-3002-7769, First Person Consulting, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Joseph Lea (0009-0004-2045-0487, First Person Consulting, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Lucy Fraser (0009-0002-5109-4134, Victorian Legal Services Board + Commissioner, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Lionel Fraser (Legal Aid New South Wales)
Año2025
Volumen25
Número3
Páginas213-232
Fecha de publicación2025-07-09
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEvaluation Journal of Australasia (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1035-719X • E-ISSN: 2515-9372
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1035719x251358851
OpenAlexW4412111227
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas24

This article demonstrates how integrating a systems perspective – specifically through the System Effects methodology – can strengthen Theory of Change processes for addressing complex issues. Using a recent project on poor lawyer wellbeing as a case study, we outline the rationale and process for applying the System Effects methodology to map the interconnected drivers of poor lawyer wellbeing. Through this approach, we identified four multi-level problem statements that capture the most influential causal factors, providing a nuanced understanding of systemic challenges within the legal profession. These findings serve as a foundation for developing a more contextually grounded and robust Theory of Change. We reflect on the value of systems approaches in strengthening the rigour and relevance of theory-based evaluations in complex environments and offer practical guidance for evaluators seeking to apply systems methodologies in their practice

Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Psychology