A Hybrid Evaluation Approach
Incorporating Multiple Cultures Into Evaluation Design
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6423938 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kathryn Dinh (0000-0002-8796-478X, Lotus Evaluation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia), Heather Worth (0000-0001-5228-9588, UNSW Sydney), Khuat Thu Hong (Institute for Social Development Studies), K Hong (Institute for Social Development Studies), Bridget Haire (0000-0002-0657-9610, UNSW Sydney) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 25 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 250-271 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-09-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Evaluation Journal of Australasia (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1035-719X • E-ISSN: 2515-9372 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1035719x251377529 |
| OpenAlex | W4414349347 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 41 |
Culturally responsive evaluation contests the presumed universality of Western-derived evaluation methods and emphasises the importance of adapting evaluation methods to be context-sensitive. It prioritises respect for the values of the communities participating in an evaluation and mutual empowerment. While there are evaluation methods and approaches that reflect Indigenous ways of knowing and experience, and frameworks for identifying the cultural positioning of communities, a challenge for evaluators is how to bring these together and apply them in an evaluation. In today’s globalised societies, there are many political, religious, cultural, social and other influences that determine people’s behaviour. A further challenge for evaluators is how to practise evaluation so that the multiple ways of knowing and being underpinning these influences can be reflected in evaluation design. This article discusses the role of culturally responsive evaluation in redressing colonial and institutional inequities that can be perpetuated by evaluation. It then describes a seven-step hybrid evaluation approach that enables diverse world views to be incorporated into evaluation design, suggesting that the approach could contribute to tackling inequities. Finally, the article discusses how this hybrid approach could assist evaluators in designing bespoke methods that reflect the world views of communities participating in an evaluation
Revisiting Foucauldian Approaches
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Reframing Evaluation
Exploring Use and Influence in Culturally Responsive Approaches to Evaluation
A Value-Based Approach to Smoking Prevention with Immigrants from Latin America
Buddhist evaluation
Understanding relationships in culturally complex evaluation contexts
Participatory Assessment of Development Interventions
Across the Colonial Divide
Emphasizing Cultural Competence in Evaluation
Unequal Power—Changing Landscapes
Looking Backward but Moving Forward
Confucian Evaluation
The Evaluation of International Development Programs
How Far Dare an Evaluator Go Toward Saving the World
Eyes on the Prize
Transparent, Translucent, Opaque
How Far Dare an Evaluator Go Toward Saving the World
Working Both-Ways
Evaluation Standards and Their Application to Indigenous Programs in Victoria, Australia
Lessons Learnt from An Evaluation of An Unexploded Ordnance Removal Program in Lao PDR
The ambivalence of post‐development
Latin America
Culture as an Object of Ethical Governance in Aids Prevention
De-Facing Power
New Possibilities? Shifts in Post-Development Theory and Practice
It's All In the Family
Decolonizing Methodologies
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |