Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A study on the artwork policy for buildings in South Korea from the perspective of cooperative governance

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6429286
AutoresM Park (0000-0001-6171-3256, Kookmin University, autor de correspondencia), Mi Ye Park (Kookmin University), Yong Soo Park (0000-0001-8416-0949, Kookmin University)
Año2024
Volumen31
Número3
Páginas371-385
Fecha de publicación2024-05-22
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Cultural Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1028-6632 • E-ISSN: 1477-2833
EditorialRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10286632.2024.2353038
OpenAlexW4398200287
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas12

Implementing the artwork policy for buildings necessitates collaborative governance, with diverse entities actively participating. In South Korea's artwork policy for buildings, the review committee exclusively selects the final artwork, blinding the artist's information for reasons of fairness. This inadvertently overlooks the artist's crucial role and obscures the work's planning and procedural aspects. Under the current policy, there is no opportunity for artists and architects to cooperate. The building owner submits the plan for artwork when reporting the building's construction and after completing the architectural design. In other words, consideration of artwork usually begins after completing an architectural design. In addition, the building owner is mainly responsible for selecting artists, analyzing sites, and developing the artwork concept. In predominant private development, private agencies representing building owners possess greater decision-making authority, yet there is insufficient scrutiny of their competence and ethical considerations. While local governments navigate improvements within the central government's mandated laws, inherent limitations constrain their progress. Private development, privately owned but designated as public art, engenders tension between private autonomy and governmental intervention. Systematic reorganization is imperative, starting with a dichotomy between private and public development to address these intricate issues comprehensively

Architectural engineering · Art · Corporate governance · Economic geography · Economics · Geography · Management · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Regional science · Sociology · Visual arts · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Engineering · Public Administration

  • Governing through collaboration

    Peter Shergold•Collaborative Governance•2008

  • One Place after Another

    Miwon Kwon•One Place after Another•2002

  • Distance or intimacy?—The arm's length principle, the British government and the arts council of Great Britain 1

    Ruth‐Blandina M Quinn•International Journal of Cultural…•1997

  • The nonprofit arts organization concept and its transformation in Korea

    WoongJo Chang, Dahyun Lee•International Journal of Cultural…•2019

  • Voices in the city. On the role of arts, artists and urban space for a just city

    Open Access•Andre L Müller•Cities•2018

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • Public art

    Simone O’callaghan, Simone O''Callaghan et al.•Visual Studies•2009

  • The Violence of Public Art

    W J T Mitchell, William J Mitchell•Critical Inquiry•1990

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae