Testing a Psychological Model of Post-Pandemic Academic Cheating
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6432075 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tiana P Johnson-Clements (The University of Western Australia), Guy J Curtis (0000-0002-4174-6955, The University of Western Australia), Joseph Clare (0000-0003-0444-4189, The University of Western Australia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 23 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 671-688 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-08-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Academic Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1570-1727 • E-ISSN: 1572-8544 |
| Editorial | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10805-024-09561-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4402014718 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 56 |
Concerns over students engaging in various forms of academic misconduct persist, especially with the post-COVID19 rise in online learning and assessment. Research has demonstrated a clear role of the personality trait psychopathy in cheating, yet little is known about why this relationship exists. Building on the research by Curtis et al. ( Personality and Individual Differences, 185 , 111277, 2022a), this study tested an extended Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) model, including psychopathy as a precursor to attitudes and subjective norms, and measures of anticipated moral emotions (shame and guilt), to predict cheating intentions and cheating behaviours. A cross-sectional survey was administered online to university students from around the globe ( n = 257). Results from a serial mediation analysis revealed that psychopathy predicted academic misconduct behaviours indirectly through attitudes, subjective norms, anticipated guilt (but not anticipated shame), and intentions. These findings indicate that cheating may be reduced by modifying attitudes to cheating, subjective norms regarding cheating, and anticipated feelings of guilt related to engaging in academic misconduct. In addition, the results revealed high rates of several forms of cheating, particularly in unsupervised online tests, which have been used more widely since the COVID-19 pandemic. This finding raises concerns regarding the poor security of such assessments
Cheating · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Pandemic · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Applied Psychology · Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Capitalising on Emotions and Emotional Regulation
Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures
Trait Activation Theory
Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3)
Expanding the Affective and Normative Components of the Theory of Planned Behavior
How can I deal with missing data in my study?
How Common Is Commercial Contract Cheating in Higher Education and Is It Increasing? A Systematic Review
Is It Really Robust?
PLS-Sem
The theory of planned behavior
Common method biases in behavioral research
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education
Covid-19 Academic Integrity Violations and Trends
Understanding how and why students use academic file-sharing and homework-help websites
Investigating antecedents of plagiarism using extended theory of planned behavior
Assignment outsourcing
Contract cheating in higher education
How Common is Cheating in Online Exams and did it Increase During the Covid-19 Pandemic? A Systematic Review
Attitude, social norms, and perceived behavioral control influence the academic integrity-related behavioral intentions of graduate students
How Prevalent is Contract Cheating and to What Extent are Students Repeat Offenders
Exploring Academic Dishonesty among University Students in Barbados
Guilt, Shame and Academic Misconduct
Self-Control, Injunctive Norms, and Descriptive Norms Predict Engagement in Plagiarism in a Theory of Planned Behavior Model
The “false consensus effect”
Personality, attitude, and demographic correlates of academic dishonesty
Moving beyond self-reports to estimate the prevalence of commercial contract cheating
Contract cheating
Explaining the Decision to Plagiarize
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |