Hate prompts participation
Examining the dynamic relationship between affective polarization and political participation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6443561 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sangwon Lee (0000-0003-2471-8079, New Mexico State University), Jihyang Choi (0000-0001-9898-3401, Ewha Womans University, Republic of Korea, autor de correspondencia), Chloe Ahn (0000-0003-1390-5215, University of Pennsylvania) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 27 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 443-461 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-06-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | New Media & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614448231177301 |
| OpenAlex | W4379389225 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 13 |
| Referencias citadas | 57 |
Political participation has long been considered a cornerstone of democracy. While most studies on political participation have been grounded on a normative approach, which assumes that political participation is driven by positive civic actions, recent studies suggest that political participation is also driven by negative forces such as overconfidence in knowledge and partisan communication flows. This article builds on the latter line of research by exploring the role of affective polarization on political participation. While this line of research is not new, it suffers from a lack of clear causal order. This study relies on three-wave panel data collected during the 2022 Korean presidential election. To ensure methodological rigor, we utilized both cross-lagged and fixed-effects panel analyses. Our findings show that affective polarization stimulates political participation rather than the reverse path. In addition, we did not observe a reciprocal relationship. Implications for democracy are discussed
Cornerstone · Democracy · Economics · Normative · Panel data · Panel survey · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Survey data collection · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Party membership motivations and political activism in a polarized new democracy
Measuring affective polarization
Privacy Divide
How Political Overconfidence Fuels Affective Polarization in Cross-cutting Discussions
Digital Discourse and Polarization
From political news consumption to political participation
The Impact of Affective Polarization on Political Participation
This is why we can’t have nice things
Effects of National Voting Experience During High School on Political Participation
Territorial disputes and affective polarization
Incidental and intentional exposure in a mock election setting on social media
A New Measure of Affective Polarization
A Self-Righteous, Not a Virtuous, Circle
The Civic Culture
Participation in America
A Virtuous Circle
Fixed Effects Regression Models
Self-perception
Information and Expression in a Digital Age
Shared Emotion
Facebook news and (de)polarization
Alienation, Aggression, and Sensation Seeking as Predictors of Adolescent Use of Violent Film, Computer, and Website Content
Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement
Democracies Divided
Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions
Dark Participation
Radical American Partisanship
Hearing the Other Side
Rethinking the Virtuous Circle Hypothesis on Social Media
Breaking the “Virtuous Circle”
Political Comedy as a Gateway to News Use, Internal Efficacy, and Participation
How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe
Social Media News Use and Political Cynicism
The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism, Issue Evaluations, and Policy Support
Cynical Nonpartisans
Implications of online incidental and selective exposure for political emotions
Reinforcing Spirals
Polarizing Communication as Media Effects on Antagonists. Understanding Communication in Conflicts in Digital Media Societies1
Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization
Voice and Equality
Strategy News Is Good News
Community, Communication, and Participation
The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century
Does affective polarisation increase turnout? Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Spain
Election Night’s Alright for Fighting
Is Polarization a Myth
How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
Inequalities in Non-Institutionalised forms of Political Participation
Emotional Rescue
The Strengthening of Partisan Affect
News Media Use and Political Engagement Among Adolescents
The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention
Testing the Reciprocal Effects of Campaign Participation
Turnout in Electoral Democracies
The Forgotten Side of Partisanship
The Power of the Dark Side
Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines
Televised Exposure to Politics
Divided by the Vote
Fear, anger, and risk
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Affect, Not Ideology
Affective polarization in multiparty systems
Affective polarization and the salience of elections
Expressive Partisanship
Maximum Likelihood for Cross-lagged Panel Models with Fixed Effects
Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 6,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 12 |