Write, record, optimize? How musicians reflect on music optimization strategies in the creative production process
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6443567 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nick Polak (Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Julian Schaap (0000-0002-3656-4225, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 27 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 4773-4789 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-04-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | New Media & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614448241243095 |
| OpenAlex | W4394013383 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 38 |
Musicians are believed to increasingly “optimize” their music to positively influence discoverability and engagement on music and social media platforms. Common examples of such optimization strategies are skipping intros, quickly moving to the chorus, or inserting danceable “hooks.” But to what extent are optimization strategies actively considered in the creative production process? And, if so, in what stage of production? In this article, we explore how professional musicians reflect on the opportunities and constraints that optimization strategies offer in the creative music production process. Based on 20 in-depth interviews with early to mid-career professional musicians and songwriters, we identify four different positions between “pure” artistic autonomy and “pure” commercialism that musicians typically take on in relation to these optimization strategies. We demonstrate that musicians are aware that sonically “working towards” platforms may bring economic success, while simultaneously maintaining a general reluctance towards outright commercial, “full optimization” ideologies
Aesthetics · Art · Economics · Microeconomics · Process (computing · Production (economics · Programming language · Computer Science · Diverse Music Education Insights · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Neuroscience and Music Perception
Negotiating Technological and Symbolic Capital
‘The real win is doing this for a living’
“If you don’t have a strong social media game, you might as well hang up your instrument”
Contextualising the Subculture/Post-Subculture Debate
Making creativity governable through dual optimization
Platformed indie
The Social Life of an Optimised Song
Self-Brand or Be Branded Out
Computing Taste
Engineering culture
Constructing popular music programs at Higher Music Education Institutions across Europe
The working life of musicians
Platform pop
Spotify Teardown
The Field of Cultural Production
The Social Self
‘Wear Clogs and just Act Normal’
Beyond the black box in music streaming
Beats and tweets
Serendipity on radio and streaming
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
Is music streaming bad for musicians? Problems of evidence and argument
The Streaming Paradox
Datafication, Literacy, and Democratization in the Music Industry
Compelled TikTok creators? The ambivalent affordances of the short video app for Filipino musicians
What do we know about algorithmic literacy? The status quo and a research agenda for a growing field
Playing to the Crowd
The Playlist Experience
Reluctant entrepreneurs
Radio space and industrial time
Imperfect sound forever
What Makes Popular Culture Popular? Product Features and Optimal Differentiation in Music
Spotify and the democratisation of music
Capturing Sound
The Field as a Black Box
Music Platforms and the Optimization of Culture
Locating Power in Platformization
First Week Is Editorial, Second Week Is Algorithmic
Roles, Revenue, and Responsibilities
The Production of Culture Perspective
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 8 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |