Replies to Critics
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6445052 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Åsa Burman (0000-0002-8232-1363, Stockholm University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 55 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 585-606 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-09-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Philosophy of the Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0048-3931 • E-ISSN: 1552-7441 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00483931251380496 |
| OpenAlex | W4414618470 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
There are three prevalent themes among the critics. First, a call to advance the concept of social power by expanding on structural power and demonstrating how telic power can be operationalized. Second, the critics want a stronger objection to the collective intentionality claim (assumed by the standard model). Third, there is a need to clarify the concept of opaque kinds of social facts, especially in relation to economic class. I integrate Khalidi’s clarification of opaqueness, elaborate on the concept of economic class, and introduce a new development of the power view by operationalizing telic power through an empirical case study
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |