Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Moving Beyond Regulation

Cross‐Sectoral Coordination in Providing Holistic Care in For‐Profit Residential Homes for Disabled People

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6452082
AutoresJialiang Cui (0000-0001-8708-1947, Department of Social Work The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong SAR, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen59
Número5
Páginas739-748
Fecha de publicación2024-09-09
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/spol.13085
OpenAlexW4402424250
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas27

The recent decades have seen an increasing trend in market‐oriented reforms in long‐term care, yet concerns about the quality of care persist, especially with for‐profit providers. Recently, Hong Kong has pioneered a shift from reinforcing government regulation to a collaborative model that leverages the capabilities of the nonprofit sector to support for‐profit providers. A key aspect of this approach is the coordination involving different sectors, which remains a less explored domain in health and social care literature. Through interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, including nonprofit operators, for‐profit providers, service users, and their carers, this study explored the coordinated work process in this newly initiated project. Analysis of participant accounts highlights the importance of relational coordination to the approach, as effective coordination among stakeholders in this context greatly depended on the quality of stakeholder relationships. This coordination was characterized by shared goals, shared knowledge, and timely, problem‐solving, and supportive communication. The dedicated efforts of nonprofit operators supported relational coordination by acting as a ‘boundary spanner’ that liaised with major stakeholders, and serving as a change agent which seized every opportunity to enhance the quality of coordination in the original system. The paper showcases a successful approach that utilizes cross‐sectoral coordination to enhance service quality in the private sector and reveals various strategies and concerns in engaging for‐profit operators, demonstrating a promising way for closer collaboration between the two sectors to mitigate the mixed effects of the marketization of long‐term care

Business · Disabled people · Economics · Microeconomics · Profit (economics · Applied Psychology · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Psychology

  • Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups

    Open Access•Jody Hoffer Gittell•Management Science•2002

  • Strengthening Community Participation by People With Disabilities in Community-Based Group Homes Through Innovative Action Research

    Open Access•Marji Erickson Warfield, Laura S Lorenz et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Boundary spanning and partnership performance

    MADS PETER KLINDT, Kelvin Baadsgaard et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Interprofessional dynamics that promote client empowerment in mental health practice

    Open Access•Jialiang Cui, Christy E Newman et al.•Journal of Social Work•2022

  • Ownership, quality and prices of nursing homes in Australia

    Open Access•Joel Yong, Ou Yang et al.•Health Policy•2021

  • Successful Qualitative Research

    John Jamieson, Braun et al.•QMiP Bulletin•2014

  • Transforming professionalism

    Open Access•Anne Douglass, Jody Hoffer Gittell•Journal of Early Childhood Research•2012

  • Improving interorganizational collaborations

    Open Access•Erika Gebo, Brenda J Bond•The Social Science Journal•2019

  • Cross-agency coordination of offender reentry

    Open Access•Brenda J Bond, Jody Hoffer Gittell•Journal of Criminal Justice•2010

  • The quasi-market for adult residential care in the UK

    Open Access•David N Barron, Elizabeth J West et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • Public/private ownership and quality of care

    Open Access•Ulf Hjelmar, Yosef Bhatti et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2018

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae