The Interhuman and What is Common to All

Martin Buber was close to sociology and sociologists from his university years on and in 1938 was head of the new Department of Sociology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Although influenced by Ferdinand Toennies, and George Simmel, he went beyond them in his philosophy of the “interhuman” from which standpoint he also criticized Max Scheler. Focal social concepts of Buber's are “the interhuman”_the dialogical relationship between persons that entails “inclusion,” or “imagining the real,” making present, and confirmation (compared here with the social psychology of George Herbert Mead); the “essential We” or common cosmos that each helps to build by speech‐with‐meaning from his or her unique stance; the distinction between the “political principle” of government and the “social principle” of fellowship and social spontaneity; and the philosophy of community that led Buber to a federalistic socialism and the vision of restructuring society into a “community of communities

Art history · Communism · Dialogical self · Epistemology · George (robot · Meaning (existential · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Socialism · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

• Martin Buber and Daoism on Interhuman Philosophy

  Open Access•David Chai•Asian Studies•2023

  Añadir item

• Intersubjectivity and the Schizophrenic Experience

  Open Access•Bruce Bradfield, Bruce Christopher Bradfield et al.•South African Journal of Psychology•2008

  Añadir item

• Intersubjectivity and the Knowing of Inner Experience

  Open Access•Bruce Bradfield•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2012

  Añadir item

• Boundary Work in Inclusive Religious Groups

  Grace Yukich•Sociology of Religion•2010

  Añadir item

• Profit, Self, and Agency

  Open Access•Galit Ailon•Critical Sociology•2022

  Añadir item

• A Dialogic Theology of Migration

  Open Access•Zohar Maor•Religions•2023

  Añadir item