Evidential Vulnerability of Religious Beliefs in the Context of Petitionary Prayers
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7150329 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Z Hong (0000-0002-5343-3008, Department of Sociology University of Macau), Cheneryue Zhang (Department of Psychology University of Macau), Anzhuo Wang (Independent researcher) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 49 |
| Número | 12 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Cognitive Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cogs.70163 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 60 |
Petitionary prayers—requests made to a deity for specific outcomes—are widely practiced across religious traditions. While their efficacy remains a subject of theological debate, they exhibit remarkable resilience to disconfirmation. In three pre‐registered studies—a field study in China and two global surveys via Prolific—we examined how religious believers (Christians, Muslims, local deity worshippers, and Hindus) update beliefs and behaviors in response to prayer successes or failures for both hypothetical co‐religionists and themselves. Results indicate that belief updates generally follow a Bayesian pattern, with increases after prayer successes and decreases after failures, though with an asymmetry favoring belief reinforcement. Notably, participants from the Prolific sample exhibit sensitivity to the prior probability of prayed‐for events, attributing greater belief increases to improbable outcomes. Muslims predict belief increases even after failed prayers, consistent with doctrines framing hardships as divine tests. Across traditions, believers estimate continued prayer regardless of past outcomes, with monotheists displaying stronger resilience. These findings illuminate the cognitive and cultural mechanisms that buffer religious beliefs against counter‐evidence, contributing to debates on the evidential vulnerability of religious credence and its parallels with epistemically self‐sealing belief systems
Religious credence is not factual belief
The preregistration revolution
Religion in the Face of Uncertainty
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
The psychology of sunk cost
Conspiracy Theories
Social Desirability Bias
Christianism … The Protestant Ethic among Unbelievers
Empirical Studies of Christian Prayer
On epistemic black holes
The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion
When prophecy fails
Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred
Instrumentality, empiricism, and rationality in Nuosu divination
Is religion just make-believe, or only for some Weird people
Searching for General Model of Conspiracy Theories and Its Implication for Public Health Policy
Third-Person Effect Research 1983–1992
A History of “Rationalism” in Victorian Britain
Do beliefs yield to evidence? Examining belief perseverance vs. change in response to congruent empirical findings
Jonathan Edwards, Petitionary Prayer, and the Cognitive Science of Religion
Rational processing or rationalization? The effect of disconfirming information on a stated religious belief
When Rituals Fail
The Third-Person Effect in Communication
Militant and Submissive Religions
The Cultural Evolution of Epistemic Practices
A Definition of Religion, and its Uses
In Mysterious Ways
Religious-And Other Beliefs
Coercing the Rain Deities in Ancient China
From the Divine to the Human
What Really Happens When Prophecy Fails
Islam, Fatalism, and Medical Intervention
The psychology and social dynamics of fetal sex prognostication in China
Magic and Empiricism in Early Chinese Rainmaking
The Ties That Bind Us
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |