Structural Alignment and Linguistic Contrast Help Children Learn a Key Principle of Spatial Construction
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7150331 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yinyuan Sean Zheng (Department of Psychology Northwestern University), Micah B Goldwater (0000-0001-8052-9497), Micah Goldwater (School of Psychology The University of Sydney), Dedre Gentner (0000-0002-5120-6688, Department of Psychology Northwestern University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 49 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | e70149-e70149 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Cognitive Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cogs.70149 |
| PMID | 41449619 |
| OpenAlex | W7117315607 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 132 |
Spatial representation and reasoning are important in cognition, yet they are challenging for children. Research has shown that comparison can support learning about common spatial structure and that using common labels can facilitate this process. Here, we show that a comparable pattern holds for learning about differences. That is, contrastive labels can promote comparison‐based learning of key spatial differences . In two experiments, 5‐ to 7‐year‐old children were asked to learn a key engineering principle—namely, that diagonal braces confer stability in building structures. Two factors were varied between subjects: the alignability of the training exemplars, and whether a contrastive label was used. Learning was assessed through a variety of transfer tasks, both immediately and after a delay of 2−5 days. The results showed that children in the high‐alignment condition performed better than those in the low‐alignment condition, replicating previous findings. Further, children who received the contrasting brace label performed better than those who did not. This suggests that hearing contrastive language can invite structural alignment and reveal differences that inform children's learning. We discuss broader implications for cognition and education
Cognition · Language acquisition · Categorization, perception, and language · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Variability and Consistency in Early Language Learning
Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons
The structure-mapping engine
Perceptual Learning
Schema induction and analogical transfer
Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination.
Children’s spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter?
Metaphor as Structure Mapping
Hard Words
Effects of Language on Visual Perception
Spatial Training Improves Children's Mathematics Ability
Metaphoric structuring
Tutorial
Shaping meanings for language
Individuation, relativity, and early word learning
Structure‐Mapping
Bootstrapping the Mind
The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System
Analogical inferences mediated by relational categories
Perceptual alignment contributes to referential transparency in indirect learning
Relational labeling unlocks inert knowledge
Language systematizes attention
Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary
On the logic of contrast
Implicit contrast in adjectives vs. nouns
Analogical processes in children’s understanding of spatial representations
The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives
Enhancing building, conversation, and learning through caregiver–child interactions in a children’s museum
Language as cognitive tool kit
Visuospatial training improves elementary students' mathematics performance
When and where do we apply what we learn
Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research
Immanuel Kant among the Tenejapans
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |