Social media as a behavior depolarizer
Evidence from Russia–Ukraine conflict
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7155751 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jitendra Yadav (0000-0003-2686-1864, ICFAI Business School), Kuldeep Singh (0000-0002-8180-4646, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation), Nripendra P Rana (0000-0003-1105-8729, Qatar University), Donnacha Dennehy (0000-0001-9931-762X, Swansea University) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 1110-1133 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-03-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Information Technology and People (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0959-3845 • E-ISSN: 1758-5813 |
| Editorial | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/itp-12-2022-0972 |
| OpenAlex | W4390735156 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 81 |
Purpose Social media has played a pivotal role in polarizing views on Russia–Ukraine conflict. The effects of polarization in online interactions have been extensively studied in many contexts. This research aims to examine how multiple social media sources may act as an integrator of information and act as a platform for depolarizing behaviors. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes the communications of 6,662 tweets related to the sanctions imposed on Russia by using textual analytics and predictive modeling. Findings The research findings reveal that the tweeting behavior of netizens was depolarized because of information from multiple social media sources. However, the influx of information from non-organizational sources such as trending topics and discussions has a depolarizing impact on the user’s pre-established attitude. Research limitations/implications For policymakers, conflict mediators and observers, and members of society in general, there is a need for (1) continuous and consistent communication throughout the crisis, (2) transparency in the information being communicated and (3) public awareness of the polarized and conflicting information being provided from multiple actors that may be biased in the claims being made about the conflict crisis. Originality/value While previous research has examined Russia–Ukraine conflict from a variety of perspectives, this is the first study to examine how social media might be used to reduce attitude polarization during times of conflict
Cynicism · Originality · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sanctions · Social media · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Media Technologies
Dynamic consent
Principal component analysis
Incivility on Facebook and political polarization
Tweeting From Left to Right
Loopholes in the Echo Chambers
Understanding misinformation and rumors that generated panic buying as a social practice during Covid-19 pandemic
Be my friend! Cultivating parasocial relationships with social media influencers
Social media analytics for end-users' expectation management in information systems development projects
Too good to be true, too good not to share
Sourcing practices of online news media in Switzerland during the war in Ukraine
Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis
Undercurrents of echo chambers and flame wars
Fake News
Forensic conflict studies
Agenda divergence in a developing conflict
Personalizing the war
Social media and visual framing of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine
Ukraine after five years of conflict
EU-Russia regulatory competition and business interests in post-Soviet countries
Russian Intervention in Ukraine
When Interdependence Produces Conflict
Echo chambers online
Donbas Conflict
Out of Gas
Advancing a Dual-Process Model to Explain Interpersonal Versus Intergroup Communication in Social Media
Making Sense of the News in an Authoritarian Regime
Conflicts and Shifts in the Kremlin’s Political Discourse since the Start of the Putin Presidency (2000–2019)
The Law of Group Polarization
Characteristics of quantifiers moderate the framing effect
Computing the everyday
Beyond individual-centric privacy
What you google is where you are from
Social network dynamics, bots, and community-based online misinformation spread
Governing online platforms
Disinformation and the media
Allport meets internet
Public sentiment towards economic sanctions in the Russia–Ukraine war
Mass Media in Interstate Conflicts
Second Decade, Second Chance? Parliament, Politics and Democratic Aspirations in Russia, Ukraine and Moldova
Fighting Propaganda with Censorship
Social media and Russian territorial irredentism
Transformed by contested digital spaces? Social media and Ukrainian diasporic ‘selves’ in the wake of the conflict with Russia
How Social Media Is Changing Conflict
Not on speaking terms, but business as usual
(Almost) Everything in Moderation
Framing and counter-framing a Peace March in Russia
State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |