The operation of ideology in coronavirus vaccine Twitter influencer commentary
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7174302 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ivana Jokanovic (University of the Witwatersrand, autor de correspondencia), Hugo Canham (0000-0003-1469-3103, University of South Africa) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 758-777 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-06-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Discourse & Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1750-4813 • E-ISSN: 1750-4821 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/17504813241252895 |
| OpenAlex | W4399742302 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 32 |
The study sought to provide a greater comprehension of the contending discourses and ideologies of coronavirus vaccine acceptance and reluctance in South Africa as revealed by Twitter influencer commentaries. 1 Naturally occurring data generated between February 2021 and February 2022 was collected from Twitter in the form of Tweets authored by South African social media influencers. The paper utilised Fairclough’s model of critical discourse analysis and we found that vaccine hesitant discourses functioned as the foundations of cultural, moral and political ideologies. They constructed a reality in which the coronavirus vaccine was deemed as risky and potentially lethal. Discourses that shed light on the ideologies underpinning coronavirus vaccine acceptance included medical-scientific and familial discourses. This research contributes to scholarship on vaccine discourses in the era of social media and pandemics. The findings may provide opportunities for productive communication and intervention with the occurrence of similar divisive phenomena in digital spaces
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Advertising · Business · Coronavirus · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Ideology · Internet privacy · Media studies · Outbreak · Political science · Politics · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Social media · Sociology · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Virology
Demystifying Content Analysis
Critical Discourse Analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media
Understanding Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy
Content analysis and thematic analysis
Vaccine hesitancy
The production of the psychiatric subject
Social media and vaccine hesitancy
Visual Mis- and Disinformation, Social Media, and Democracy
What makes people share political content on social media? The role of emotion, authority and ideology
Information society and digital divide in South Africa
Diffracting the Global
Marxism, Ideology, and Moral Philosophy
Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality
So-called influencers”
In your experience’
Foucault, Power and Participation
Varieties of Discourse
Moral discourses and pharmaceuticalised governance in households
Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool
Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |