Comparative Biomedical Policy
Governing Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7266972 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael O’neill (0000-0001-5224-9121, University of Ottawa, autor de correspondencia), Michael A O'Neill |
| Año | 2005 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 507-509 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2005-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423905339990 |
| OpenAlex | W2135204977 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 24 |
Comparative Biomedical Policy: Governing Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Ivor Bleiklei, Malcolm L. Goggin and Christine Rothmayr, eds., London: Routledge, 2004, pp. 284. Few issues have the potential to combine elements of science fact and science fiction as does the field of biomedical research and its offshoot, assisted reproductive technologies (ART). As newspapers testify with regularity, this area of science and medicine uniquely combines promises for the improvement of human health but also exemplifies the dangers associated with scientists playing god with the very the building blocks of our species. Confronted with these stark opposites, public authorities have entered the fray and have tried, with varied responses, to frame these practices in such as way as to encourage and stimulate the positive elements of this area of research and medicine, such as in vitro fertilization , while cutting off or severely circumscribing the areas which have been deemed immoral or unethical, such as human cloning. It is where issues of morality or ethics enter the policy discourse that the waters get murky and where, as a result, governments find the arbitration between first-person experiences and societal norms the most difficult
Bioethics · Biology · Business · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Field (mathematics · Human cloning · Morality · Newspaper · Payment · Political science · Public relations · Reproductive technology · Sociology · Engineering · Law · Philosophy · Reproductive Health and Technologies
You can go your own way
Embryos, stem cell research, and the promise of health
Reluctant Rulers
Troubling 'the norm'? Or, how to become a recognisable, visible gay parent through surrogacy
Dropping the Curtain
Secular citizens, pious MPs
Strange bedfellows
Debate
Direct Legislation in North America and Europe
Learning from Co-evolution of Policy and Technology. Different PGDs in the Netherlands, Germany and Britain
The long and winding road from Asilomar to Brussels
Precarious labour
Explaining a Policy Failure
The golden cage of sperm banking industry
Diverging against all odds? Regulatory paths in embryonic stem cell research across Western Europe
Tobacco control in the EU-15
Regulating biomedicine in Europe and North America
Churches as Societal Veto Players
Biomedical Policies in Belgium and Italy
From laboratories to chambers of parliament and beyond
Oocyte provision as a (quasi) social market
When doctors shape policy
The political flow of wisdom
The puzzle of permissiveness
| Obras citantes distintas | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,04 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2003 - 2024 (22) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 22 |