Indigenous Peoples and the Second World War
The Politics, Experiences, and Legacies of War in the U.S., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7307966 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Paul C Rosier (Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 106 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 804-804 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-11-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of American History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jahist/jaz619 |
| OpenAlex | W2992427085 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
R. Scott Sheffield (University of Fraser Valley, British Columbia) and Noah Riseman (Australian Catholic University) compare the mentalities, motivations, and experiences of a diverse group of indigenous peoples negotiating the duties, obligations, and opportunities inherent in their relationships with colonial states: the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia (Native Americans, First Nations peoples, Māori, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, respectively). Part 1 examines the formation of these relationships to the start of World War II. Part 2 explores the multiple dimensions of indigenous peoples' army service and home front experiences during the war. Part 3 considers the impacts of such service on domestic political relations in the four countries. The animating question for the authors is this: Why would indigenous peoples serve their country's armies in the name of freedoms and rights not accorded them at home? Scholars have addressed this important and interesting issue in national studies. This book adds a useful comparative transnational analysis to the scholarship. It aims to “lift each country's experience out of its domestic silo for collective transnational examination, comparison and cross-fertilization” (p. 7). Sensitive to the risk of “homogenising Indigenous experiences,” the authors weave each of the four groups into a coherent analysis rather than studying each group in separate chapters (p. 10
Colonialism · Ethnology · Indigenous · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · World War II · Canadian Identity and History · Gender Studies · Law
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |