Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Dispreferred responses when texting

Delaying that ‘no’ response

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7431289
AutoresJohanna Rendle‐short (0000-0002-4916-1118, Australian National University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2015
Volumen9
Número6
Páginas643-661
Fecha de publicación2015-09-21
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDiscourse & Communication (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1750-4813 • E-ISSN: 1750-4821
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1750481315600309
OpenAlexW2179453393
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas17

Socially, people find it difficult to say ‘no’ to requests or invitations. In spoken interaction (face-to-face), we orient to this difficulty through the design of our responses. An agreement response (preferred) is characteristically said straightaway with minimal gap between request and response. A disagreement response (dispreferred) is characteristically delayed through silence and by prefacing the disagreement turn with tokens such as ‘well’, ‘uhm’ and ‘uh’ or with accounts as to why the recipient cannot accept the request or invitation. The question for this article concerns what occurs when requests or invitations are made via texting. The results from 329 texting interactions showed that if responses to a request or invitation were delayed by more than 1 minute, it was much more likely be a ‘no’ rather than a ‘yes’ response ( p < 0.001). In other words, preferred responses were sent quickly; dispreferred responses were delayed. Understanding texting as social interaction is increasingly important as the range of communicative options continues to widen (e.g. Facebook, Short Message Service (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), Instant Messaging (IM), email). This study shows preference organisation similarities between spoken interaction and texting with texters orienting to social norms concerning delayed responses. Further research is needed to understand in what contexts a person might choose one communicative medium over another

Silence · Digital Communication and Language · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Speech and dialogue systems

  • Requesting on WhatsApp

    Open Access•Taiane Malabarba•TESOL in Context•2022

  • Methodological approaches applicable to patient-provider interaction analysis

    Open Access•Elena Rey Velasco, Hanne Sæderup Pedersen et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2022

  • Displaying consideration via EHM (‘uhm’) in Hebrew WhatsApp dialogues

    Open Access•Michal Marmorstein•Discourse Context & Media•2021

  • Influence of professional mobile device usage on Work/Family Border Theory

    Open Access•Sharon L Storch, Anna V Ortiz Juarez-Paz•Mobile Media & Communication•2022

  • Bringing identities to the table

    Open Access•Marike Fordonnell, Annayah M B Prosser et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2024

  • Challenging askability through particles

    Open Access•Natàlia Server Benetó•Journal of Pragmatics•2023

  • Distort, Extort, Deceive and Exploit

    Open Access•Elisabeth Carter•The British Journal of Criminology•2021

  • Doing Conversation Analysis

    Paul Ten Have•Doing Conversation Analysis•2007

  • Language and the Internet

    Open Access•David Crystal•Language and the Internet•2001

  • On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation

    Harvey Sacks•Talk and Social Organisation•1987

  • Address terms in the service of other actions

    Open Access•E Clayman, Steven E Clayman•Discourse & Communication•2010

  • Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments

    Open Access•A Pomerantz•Structures of Social Action•1985

  • Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction

    Gail Jefferson•Pragmatics & Beyond New Series•2004

  • Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology

    John Heritage•Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology•2013

  • Sequence Organization in Interaction

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Sequence Organization in…•2007

  • IMing, Text Messaging, and Adolescent Social Networks

    Open Access•J Alison Bryant, Ashley Sanders‐jackson et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • A Conversation Analysis View of Communication as Jointly Accomplished Social Interaction

    Maurice Nevile, Johanna Rendle‐short et al.•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2009

  • Catherine, you're wasting your time

    Open Access•Johanna Rendle‐short, Johanna Rendle-Short•Journal of Pragmatics•2007

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • Pragmatics

    Open Access•C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Pragmatics•1983

Obras citantes distintas7
Citas por año1,4
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2024 (4)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 7

Herramientas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae