Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The rise of algorithmic governance and the dual revolution

Applications, challenges, and governance of artificial intelligence in public administration

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7474530
AutoresChunning Wang (0009-0005-6812-475X, Macao Polytechnic University), Yifen Yin (0000-0002-9551-1537, Macao Polytechnic University), Haoqian Hu (0009-0005-8844-438X, Macao Polytechnic University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Volumen86
Páginas103264
Fecha de publicación2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTechnology in Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103264
OpenAlexW7128593721
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas109

Artificial intelligence (AI) is penetrating the domain of public administration with unprecedented depth and breadth, acting as both a powerful tool for enhancing government efficiency and a profound challenge to traditional democratic values and governance structures. To comprehensively understand its application roles, core challenges, and future governance pathways, this paper conducts a systematic literature review to construct and provide robust empirical support and systematic theoretical elucidation for a “tool-paradigm dual revolution” analytical framework. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search and multi-stage screening of the Web of Science database, ultimately including 694 core articles for thematic synthesis. Our analysis reveals that AI plays a dual role in public administration. As a “tool”, it significantly enhances administrative efficiency in specific domains. However, its deep application is precipitating a “paradigm revolution” that systematically challenges core public values such as fairness, accountability, and justice by reshaping power relations and decision-making logic. Our framework reveals how the pursuit of tool-level efficiency endogenously and inevitably triggers paradigm-level power restructuring and value conflicts, particularly the problems of algorithmic bias and broken chains of accountability. The paper concludes that the introduction of AI in public administration is a profound governance transformation, the success of which depends not on the technology itself, but on the ability to construct a robust democratic accountability and ethical regulatory framework centered on “meaningful human control” and “data justice” to ensure that technological development consistently serves the public interest.

Administration (probate law · Corporate governance · Dual (grammatical number · Information governance · Project governance · Artificial Intelligence Applications · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Smart Cities and Technologies

  • Digital Teaching Competencies and Algorithmic Ethics in Learning Assessments Within Virtual Environments

    Open Access•Wilson Alexander Zambrano Vélez, Elan Ignacio Delgado Cobeña et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • Algorithmic Transparency and Citizen Trust in Digital Governance

    Open Access•Ye Zheng, Muhammad Farhan•Technology in Society•2026

  • Algorithmic management practices, trust, and gig-worker continuance

    Open Access•Sohaib Mustafa, Sari Mansour•Technology in Society•2026

  • Improving public services using artificial intelligence

    Paul Henman•Asia Pacific Journal of Public…•2020

  • Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach

    Michael Veale, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius•Computer Law Review International•2021

  • From ethics washing to ethics bashing

    Open Access•Elettra Bietti•Proceedings of the 2020…•2020

  • Principled Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Jessica Fjeld, Nele Achten et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2020

  • An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public management

    Bernd W Wirtz, Wilhelm M Müller et al.•Public Management Review•2019

  • Literature reviews as independent studies

    Open Access•Krau, Matthias Breier et al.•Review of Managerial Science•2022

  • Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness

    Open Access•Sam Corbett-Davies, Sam Corbett‐Davies et al.•Proceedings of the 23rd ACM…•2017

  • Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact

    Open Access•Alexandra Chouldechova•Big Data•2017

  • Digitalization and business models

    Open Access•Andrea Caputo, Simone Pizzi et al.•Journal of Business Research•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

    Open Access•Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca et al.•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • Analysing and Assessing Accountability

    Open Access•Mark Bovens•European Law Journal•2007

  • Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

    Open Access•David Tranfield, David Denyer et al.•British Journal of Management•2003

  • Fairness in Algorithmic Policing

    Open Access•Duncan Purves•Journal of the American…•2022

  • The importance of the assurance that “humans are still in the decision loop” for public trust in artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Naomi Aoki•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • AI governance in the public sector

    Open Access•Maciej Kuziemski, Gianluca Misuraca•Telecommunications Policy•2020

  • Gotham city. Predicting ‘corrupted’ municipalities with machine learning

    Open Access•Guido de Blasio, Alessio D’Ignazio et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • In Waze We Trust

    Open Access•Shenja van der Graaf•Media and Communication•2018

  • Opening the government’s black boxes

    Katherine Fink•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Against “Democratizing AI”

    Open Access•Johannes Himmelreich•AI & Society•2023

  • Gender bias perpetuation and mitigation in AI technologies

    Open Access•Sinéad O’connor, Helen K Liu•AI & Society•2024

  • AI for the public. How public interest theory shifts the discourse on AI

    Open Access•Theresa Züger, Hadi Asghari•AI & Society•2023

  • Deconstructing public participation in the governance of facial recognition technologies in Canada

    Open Access•Maurice Jones, Fenwick Mckelvey•AI & Society•2025

  • Public procurement of artificial intelligence systems

    Open Access•Merve Hickok•AI & Society•2024

  • Conservative AI and social inequality

    Open Access•M Zajko•AI & Society•2021

  • Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration

    Open Access•Giuseppe Romeo, Daniela Conti•AI & Society•2026

  • Institutionalised distrust and human oversight of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Johann Laux•AI & Society•2024

  • Risk Assessment Tools on Trial

    Open Access•Neha Chugh•IEEE Technology and Society…•2022

  • Moral Crumple Zones

    Open Access•M C Elish•Engaging Science Technology and…•2019

  • Public value creation and robotic process automation

    Open Access•Jörgen Johansson, Michel Thomsen et al.•Transforming Government: People,…•2023

  • Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Evil

    Open Access•Matthew Young, Johannes Himmelreich et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2021

  • The Emerging Digital Twin Bureaucracy in the 21st Century

    Open Access•Seok-Jin Eom•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • Machine Intelligence, Bureaucracy, and Human Control

    Open Access•Justin B Bullock, Hsini Huang et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • Predictive Analytics and Child Welfare

    Open Access•Joanna Redden•Canadian Journal of Communication•2020

  • The Changing Face of Accountability in Humanitarianism

    Open Access•Marc Van Den Homberg, Caroline M Gevaert et al.•Politics and Governance•2020

  • Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data

    Andrew F Hayes, Klaus Krippendorff•Communication Methods and Measures•2007

  • Artificial intelligence, algorithms, and social inequality

    Open Access•M Zajko•Sociology Compass•2022

  • Seeing without knowing

    Open Access•Mike Ananny, K Crawford•New Media & Society•2016

  • Will Algorithms Blind People? The Effect of Explainable AI and Decision-Makers’ Experience on AI-supported Decision-Making in Government

    Open Access•Marijn Janssen, M H den Hartog et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2020

  • Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making

    Open Access•Agneta Ranerup, Helle Zinner Henriksen•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Artificial intelligence and speedy trial in the judiciary

    Open Access•Weslei Gomes de Sousa, Rafael Antunes Fidelis et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Faced with digital bureaucrats

    Open Access•Peter André Busch•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance

    Open Access•Marijn Janssen, George Kuk•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Public engagement and AI

    Open Access•Christopher Wilson•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • The strategic use of AI in the public sector

    Open Access•Illugi Torfason Hjaltalin, Hallur Thor Sigurdarson•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • The impact of chatbots on public service provision

    Open Access•Anna Grøndahl Larsen, Asbjørn Følstad•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI

    Open Access•Hans De Bruijn, Martijn Warnier et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Facial recognition systems in policing and racial disparities in arrests

    Open Access•Thaddeus L Johnson, Natasha N Johnson et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • Governance of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Bernd W Wirtz, Jan C Weyerer et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Justin B Bullock•The American Review of Public…•2019

  • A shallow defence of a technocracy of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Henrik Skaug Sætra•Technology in Society•2020

  • Machine Learning for Social Services

    Ian Pan, Laura B Nolan et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2017

  • Just like I thought’

    Open Access•Friso Selten, Marcel Robeer et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Daniel S Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson Schiff et al.•Public Administration•2021

  • Uncertainty, risk and the use of algorithms in policy decisions

    Open Access•Kathrin Hartmann, Georg Wenzelburger•Policy Sciences•2021

  • Governance by satellite

    Open Access•Daniel Van Der Velden, Laurens Klerkx et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2025

  • Navigating power dynamics in the public sector through AI-driven algorithmic decision-making

    Open Access•Kamran Mahroof, Vishanth Weerakkody et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • Explaining Why the Computer Says No

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Accountable Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Madalina Busuioc•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making

    Open Access•Saar Alon-Barkat, Madalina Busuioc•Journal of Public Administration…•2023

  • AI as Governance

    Open Access•Henry Farrell•Annual Review of Political Science•2025

  • Deliberativedemocratictheory

    Sherrie Chamber, Simone Chamber•Annual Review of Political Science•2003

  • The agency of algorithms

    Rik Peeters, Sarah Giest et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Making governance agile

    Open Access•Yiran Li, Yingying Fan et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2025

  • Epistemologies of predictive policing

    Open Access•Jens Hälterlein•Big Data & Society•2021

  • Municipal surveillance regulation and algorithmic accountability

    Open Access•Meg Young, Michael Katell et al.•Big Data & Society•2019

  • Democratic governance in an age of datafication

    Open Access•Joanna Redden•Big Data & Society•2018

  • Big Data Surveillance

    Open Access•Sarah Brayne•American Sociological Review•2017

  • People's Councils for Ethical Machine Learning

    Open Access•Dan Mcquillan•Social Media + Society•2018

  • Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments

    Open Access•Richard A Berk, Richard Berk et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2021

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae