The politics of conservative elites and the 'liberal media' argument
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7499604 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David Domke (University of Washington, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1999 |
| Volumen | 49 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 35-58 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1999-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0021-9916 • E-ISSN: 1460-2466 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/joc/49.4.35 |
| OpenAlex | W4237642602 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
Recent evidence suggests that conservative elites' claims of a liberal media are having an impact upon public perceptions of news coverage. With this in mind, we examined two related questions in the context of the 1988, 1992, and 1996 presidential elections. First, what factors may be prompting conservative elites to make allegations of liberal media bias? Second, what factors may influence when news media report these criticisms during presidential campaigns? Findings suggest that these criticisms of news media are at least partly strategic and reflect a dynamic relationship between political elites and journalists during a presidential campaign
Argument (complex analysis · Content analysis · Context (archaeology · Media bias · Media coverage · Media studies · News media · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential campaign · Presidential system · Public opinion · Social science · Sociology · History · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,19 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2005 - 2026 (22) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |