Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Soft power, sharp power? Exploring RT ’s dual role in Russia’s diplomatic toolkit

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7501112
AutoresSofya Glazunova (0000-0002-1974-6414, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, autor de correspondencia), Axel Bruns (0000-0002-3943-133X, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia), Edward Hurcombe (0000-0002-5838-2019, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia), Silvia Montaña-Niño (0000-0002-4238-0801, The ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, Queensland University of Technology’s node, Brisbane, Australia), Sidiki Coulibaly (0000-0002-1119-4686, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia), Abdul Karim Obeid (0000-0002-9838-1838, The ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, Queensland University of Technology’s node, Brisbane, Australia)
Año2022
Volumen26
Número16
Páginas3292-3317
Fecha de publicación2022-12-20
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInformation Communication & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-118X • E-ISSN: 1468-4462
EditorialRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1369118x.2022.2155485
OpenAlexW4312082064
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14
Referencias citadas26

This article examines the multilingual audiences of Russian outlet RT on Facebook. RT is a state media outlet known for spreading strategic Kremlin narratives and disinformation in support of Russia’s domestic and foreign policy objectives to large and multilingual global audiences. RT serves as a central pillar of the Russian information influence apparatus, and an instrument of both ‘soft’ and ‘sharp power’, the latter describing the use of information manipulation to interfere with foreign public spheres. While many studies have concentrated on the English-language content of RT to understand its impact on Western democracies, in this article, we examine the sharing of RT content across all six RT languages, and we investigate what audiences from the six language communities share RT content on Facebook. We find ideologically diverging patterns across these communities, with particular resonance for RT content targeting the political faultlines in different regions and countries and conclude that RT’s role as a tool for sharp power is now dominant

Art · Content (measure theory · Disinformation · Foreign policy · Ideology · Literature · Media studies · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Social media · Sociology · Soft power · Global Security and Public Health · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Media Studies and Communication · Law

  • Naming the enemy

    Open Access•Charlotte Wagnsson, Albin Östervall et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Anti-Systemic Counterpublics

    Frederik Møller Henriksen•Javnost - The Public•2024

  • From Soft Power to Sharp Power

    Open Access•Otar Pareishvili•Central European Journal of…•2026

  • Not only compatriots

    Open Access•Julia Kling, Serge Poliakoff•Media War & Conflict•2026

  • Dissemination of RT and Sputnik Content in European Digital Alternative News Environments

    Open Access•Frederik Møller Henriksen, Jakob Bæk Kristensen et al.•The International Journal of…•2024

  • Social media, conspiracy theories, and authoritarianism

    Open Access•Shahram Akbarzadeh, Ali Mamouri et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2025

  • What makes stories effective

    Yanyan Li, Yang Li•Journal of Information Technology…•2025

  • Geopolitical mythmaking

    Open Access•Bianca Welker•Critical Discourse Studies•2025

  • Mediated Public Diplomacy and RT on Instagram

    Cathy Winkler, Virginia Massignan et al.•Journalism Studies•2024

  • Disrupting or invigorating an anti-democratic counterpublic? How highly active commenters engage on RT German’s Facebook page

    Open Access•Arista Beseler, Florian Toepfl et al.•New Media & Society•2026

  • Conspiracy, Propaganda, or ‘Fake News’? How YouTube Audiences Responded to RT Coverage of Covid-19

    Sofya Glazunova•Problems of Post-Communism•2025

  • A Virtual Battlefield for Embassies

    Zhi Lin•Political Communication•2024

  • Computational Communication Methods for Examining Problematic News-Sharing Practices on Facebook at Scale

    Open Access•Daniel Angus, Axel Bruns et al.•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Beyond the Battlefield

    Open Access•Yiwen Zhang•Society•2025

  • Gatewatching and News Curation

    Axel Bruns•Gatewatching and News Curation•2018

  • ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software

    Open Access•Mathieu Jacomy, T Venturini et al.•PLoS ONE•2014

  • From Newsworthiness to Shareworthiness

    Open Access•Damian Trilling, Petro Tolochko et al.•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2017

  • Gephi

    Open Access•Mathieu Bastian, Sébastien Heymann et al.•Proceedings of the International…•2009

  • Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

    Open Access•Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume et al.•Journal of Statistical Mechanics:…•2008

  • Conceptualizing “Dark Platforms”. Covid-19-Related Conspiracy Theories on 8kun and Gab

    Open Access•Jing Zeng, Mike S Schäfer•Digital Journalism•2021

  • Making Sense of Emotions and Affective Investments in War

    Open Access•Precious Chatterje‐doody, Rhys Crilley•Media and Communication•2019

  • Science-related populism

    Open Access•Niels G Mede, Mike S Schäfer•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Karen M Douglas, Robbie M Sutton et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2017

  • News Sharing in Social Media

    Open Access•Anna Sophie Kümpel, Veronika Karnowski et al.•Social Media + Society•2015

  • Understanding RT’s Audiences

    Open Access•Rhys Crilley, M Gillespie et al.•The International Journal of…•2020

  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015

    Open Access•Nic Newman, David A Levy et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2015

  • Sharing and social media

    Open Access•Nicholas A John•New Media & Society•2022

  • Posverdad, o la narración del procés catalán desde el exterior

    Open Access•Carlos López-Olano, Vicente Fenoll•El Profesional de la Informacion•2019

  • Sourcing the Arab Spring

    Open Access•Alfred Hermida, Susan C Lewis et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2014

  • Public Diplomacy and Soft Power

    Open Access•Joseph S Nye•The Annals of the American…•2008

  • Nation branding in the post-broadcast era

    Open Access•Galina Miazhevich•European Journal of Cultural…•2018

  • Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool

    Open Access•Ilya Yablokov•Politics•2015

  • Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Ted Goertzel•Political Psychology•1994

  • A Turn Toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004–2008

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett, Dustin Carnahan et al.•Political Behavior•2013

  • The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination

    Clark Mccauley, Susan Jacques•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Curated Flows

    Open Access•Kjerstin Thorson, Caroline Wells•Communication Theory•2015

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

Obras citantes distintas14
Citas por año4,67
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2026 (4)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 14
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae