Controversial information spreads faster and further than non-controversial information in Reddit
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7520192 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jasser, Jasser Jasser (University of Central Florida), Ivan Garibay (0000-0002-3302-9382, University of Central Florida, autor de correspondencia), Steve Scheinert (Deloitte (United States)), Alexander V Mantzaris (0000-0002-0026-5725, University of Central Florida) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 5 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 111-122 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-05-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Computational Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2432-2725 • E-ISSN: 2432-2717 |
| Editorial | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s42001-021-00121-z |
| OpenAlex | W3165338456 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
Online users discuss and converse about all sorts of topics on social networks. Facebook, Twitter, Reddit are among many other networks where users can have this freedom of information sharing. The abundance of information shared over these networks makes them an attractive area for investigating all aspects of human behavior on information dissemination. Among the many interesting behaviors, controversiality within social cascades is of high interest to us. It is known that controversiality is bound to happen within online discussions. The online social network platform Reddit has the feature to tag comments as controversial if the users have mixed opinions about that comment. The difference between this study and previous attempts at understanding controversiality on social networks is that we do not investigate topics that are known to be controversial. On the contrary, we examine typical cascades with comments that the readers deemed to be controversial concerning the matter discussed. This work asks whether controversially initiated information cascades have distinctive characteristics than those not controversial in Reddit. We used data collected from Reddit consisting of around 17 million posts and their corresponding comments related to cybersecurity issues to answer these emerging questions. From the comparative analyses conducted, controversial content travels faster and further from its origin. Understanding this phenomenon would shed light on how users or organization might use it to their help in controlling and spreading a specific beneficiary message
Converse · Data science · Epistemology · Information cascade · Internet privacy · Phenomenon · Social media · Social network (sociolinguistics · World Wide Web · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology
Annual Research Review
Investigating the development of group identity through social reward signalling in a central Manosphere forum
Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience
Understanding perceived characteristics and causes of orthorexia nervosa in online communities—A Reddit analysis
An Exploratory Study of Incels’ Dating App Experiences, Mental Health, and Relational Well-Being
Affective, cognitive, and contextual cues in Reddit posts on artificial intelligence
Networks, Crowds, and Markets
The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election
Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks
Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks
Echo chambers online
A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades
Popularity Dynamics and Intrinsic Quality in Reddit and Hacker News
Quantifying Political Polarity Based on Bipartite Opinion Networks
News, Talk, Opinion, Participation
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |