Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Time's up, timed out

Reflections on Social Time and Legal Pluralism

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7528629
AutoresCarol J Greenhouse (0009-0008-9447-9513, Princeton University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen46
Número1
Páginas141-153
Fecha de publicación2014-01-02
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0732-9113 • E-ISSN: 2305-9931
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07329113.2014.882102
OpenAlexW2058861796
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas10

This essay connects two longstanding anthropological themes by reconsidering Durkheim's distinction between social time and personal time through the lens of legal pluralism; I also turn the temporal lens the other way, to reflect on legal pluralism. Drawing on the work of the von Benda-Beckmanns, I begin by suggesting that we might look for illuminating connections between social time and legal pluralism wherever people make urgent demands of law, and wherever states turn to law as a means of social engineering. That possibility informs my essay and choice of examples, all from the United States. First, I review two major pieces of social legislation that were explicit in their social engineering goals. Next, I consider the temporalities inscribed in the eligibility requirements for social programs set up under the broad terms of those acts. In the conclusion, I return to the question of how social time and legal pluralism might be mutually informing in ways that shed fresh light on both themes – blurring the line between social time and personal time, and considering legal pluralism as extending to the interrelation of memberships and subjective attachments

Epistemology · Inscribed figure · Law and economics · Legal pluralism · Legal profession · Legal realism · Legislation · Lens (geology · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Sociology · Temporalities · Through-the-lens metering · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Emile Durkheim and Sociology · Law · Philosophy

  • The Temporal Rivalries of Human Rights

    Fleur Johns, Johns Johns•Indiana Journal of Global Legal…•2016

  • Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow

    Paul Stubbs•Innovation The European Journal…•2017

  • Interregna

    Open Access•Lynette J Chua•Law & Social Inquiry•2020

  • When it rains

    Open Access•Kessie Alexandre•Geoforum•2018

  • Asynchronous mobilities

    Open Access•Loren Landau•Mobilities•2021

  • The Paradox of Relevance

    Carol J Greenhouse•Paradox of Relevance•2011

  • Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism

    Franz Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz Von Benda‐beckmann•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•2002

  • Scape-Goat and Magic Charm

    Franz Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz Von Benda‐beckmann•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•1989

  • A Moment's Notice

    Carol J Greenhouse•Moment's Notice•1996

  • Legal Pluralism and Social Justice in Economic and Political Development

    Open Access•Franz Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz Von Benda‐beckmann•IDS Bulletin•2001

  • Durkheim and Law

    Open Access•Carol J Greenhouse•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2011

  • The Cultural Anthropology of Time

    Nancy D Munn, N Munn•Annual Review of Anthropology•1992

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2016 - 2021 (6)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae