Public Opinion Polarization by Individual Revenue from the Social Preference Theory
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7531489 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tinggui Chen (0000-0001-6061-2517, Zhejiang Gongshang University, autor de correspondencia), Qianqian Li (0000-0002-5462-3460, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Peihua Fu (0000-0001-5150-6464, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Jianjun Yang (0000-0001-6785-9627, University of North Georgia), Chonghuan Xu (0000-0001-9757-1915, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Guodong Cong (0000-0002-9819-1508, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Gongfa Li (0000-0002-2695-2742, Wuhan University of Science and Technology) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 17 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 946-946 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-02-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Editorial | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph17030946 |
| PMID | 32033012 |
| OpenAlex | W3005488972 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
Social conflicts occur frequently duringthe social transition period and the polarization of public opinion happens occasionally. By introducing the social preference theory, the target of this paper is to reveal the micro-interaction mechanism of public opinion polarization. Firstly, we divide the social preferences of Internet users (network nodes) into three categories: egoistic, altruistic, and fair preferences, and adopt the revenue function to define the benefits obtained by individuals with different preferences among their interaction process so as to analyze their decision-making behaviors driven by the revenue. Secondly, the revenue function is used to judge the exit rules of nodes in a network, and then a dynamic network of spreading public opinionwith the node (individual) exit mechanism is built based on a BA scale-free network. Subsequently, the influences of different social preferences,as well as individual revenue on the effect of public opinionpolarization, are analyzed through simulation experiments. The simulation results show that(1) Different social preferences demonstrate different influences on the evolution of public opinions, (2) Individuals tend to interact with ones with different preferences, (3) The network with a single preference or a high aggregation is more likely to form public opinion polarization. Finally, the practicability and effectiveness of the proposed model are verified by a real case
Economics · Microeconomics · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Preference · Public opinion · Revenue · Social media · Social network (sociolinguistics · The Internet · World Wide Web · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Modeling misinformation herd immunity from a multi-mechanism integration perspective
Transitioning from Face-To-Face to Online Learning During Covid-19
Path Optimization of Medical Waste Transport Routes in the Emergent Public Health Event of Covid-19
Modeling Multidimensional Public Opinion Polarization Process under the Context of Derived Topics
Modeling Network Public Opinion Propagation with the Consideration of Individual Emotions
Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Micro-Level Estimation of Optimal Consumption Choice With Intertemporal Nonseparability in Preferences and Measurement Errors
Risk Propagation Model and Its Simulation of Emergency Logistics Network Based on Material Reliability
The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects
The Law of Group Polarization
Endogenous Changes in Public Opinion Dynamics
Agent-Based Modelling Approach for Multidimensional Opinion Polarization in Collective Behaviour
Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,83 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |