Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Ten Notes on Primitive Imperial Accumulation

Ginés de Sepúlveda, Las Casas, Fernández de Oviedo

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7534535
AutoresAlberto Moreiras (0000-0002-3436-9653, autor de correspondencia)
Año2000
Volumen2
Número3
Páginas343-363
Fecha de publicación2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInterventions (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-801X • E-ISSN: 1469-929X
EditorialRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13698010020019181
OpenAlexW2088817578
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas9

It seems necessary to go beyond traditional understandings of Spanish imperial reason as a mere ideological cover for the extraction of precious minerals or, alternatively, as the territorial extension of national Catholic unification on the model of the Inquisition - or both. A critique of imperial reason must proceed through the thinking of its unthinkable history in the early times of the Spanish Conquest of the New World: when terror, and not hegemony, still prevailed absolutely. The surplus of enjoyment upon which Spanish terror came to be known as the precondition of law in the land constitutes imperial reason at the same time as it deconstitutes it. But it is only because its constitution cannot be thought without its deconstitution that imperial reason must posit the unthinkability of a primitive imperial accumulation as its very condition of possibility. Hegemony processes in the New World, thought from imperial reason, will show themselves to be a modality of relationship with primitive imperial accumulation. They are the way in which imperial reason survived itself historically by presenting itself as always already its own critique. If Ginés de Sepúlveda, Las Casas, or Fernández de Oviedo can be thought to be organic thinkers of the Spanish Empire, it is because they let us raise the question of the original terror upon which hegemonic reason functions. The violence of empire can then be thought anew. But the problem remains whether a focus on parahegemony today can be historically conceptualized as an epochal breakthrough that would restitute critical thinking to a non-imperial destiny. Keywords: Colonial Latin American LiteratureImperial ReasonPrimitive Accumulation

Biology · Botany · Fern · Early Modern Spanish Literature · Latin American history and culture · Spanish Literature and Culture Studies

  • Hybridity and Double Consciousness

    Alberto Moreiras•Cultural Studies•1999

  • Paying Tribute for the Dead

    Jennifer Scheper Hughes•Labor Studies in Working-Class…•2023

  • The order of order

    Alberto Moreiras•Journal of Latin American…•1999

  • Anthropologists are Talking - About Contemporary Plantations. Technologies, Violence, and Vulnerability Across Geographies and Genealogies

    Sophie Chao, Christopher Krupa et al.•Ethnos•2024

  • The long twentieth century

    Giovanni Arrighi•The long twentieth century•1994

  • Lords of all the world

    A R Pagden•Lords of all the world•1995

  • Death in the Andes

    Open Access•Gareth Williams•The Latin American Subaltern…•2001

  • The modern world-system

    Immanuel Maurice Wallerstein, Antonio Resines•The Modern World-System I:…•1974

  • Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History

    Dipesh Chakrabarty•Representations•1992

Obras citantes distintas4
Citas por año0,15
Intervalo de citas1999 - 2024 (26)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae