Differential Bone Destruction
Some Comments
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7601235 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard W Casteel (University of California, Davis, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1971 |
| Volumen | 36 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 466-469 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1971-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0002-7316 • E-ISSN: 2325-5064 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/278467 |
| OpenAlex | W850661780 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
The role of scavengers, especially dogs, with reference to archaeological faunal remains is not always clear. While distortion admittedly results from the activities of these animals, total destruction of all such evidence is questioned. Emphasis is placed upon fish remains in the examples and both ethnographic and archaeological data are used. It is argued that a more thorough knowledge of the nature of the food items themselves will greatly aid in assessing both their potential archaeological visibility and the information they may yield
Archaeology · Biology · Environmental ethics · Ethnography · Fish · Fish <Actinopterygii> · Fishery · Geography · Visibility · Forensic and Genetic Research · History · Identification and Quantification in Food · Marine animal studies overview · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,06 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1978 - 1986 (9) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |