Styles and principles in archaeological publication
Chester reviewed
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7658970 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Martin Millett (0000-0003-4073-3260, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1989 |
| Volumen | 63 |
| Número | 240 |
| Páginas | 536-539 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1989-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0003-598X • E-ISSN: 1745-1744 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003598x00076511 |
| OpenAlex | W2473910120 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
Big urban excavation campaigns are not easy to publish. The quantity of primary data is overwhelming and, even when only the essentials are published, a hard choice has to be made. By period? By area? By theme? In whole volumes? Or slice-by-slice in instalments or ‘fascicles’? The issues are here explored in reviewing a batch of publications from Chester, in the series, ‘Excavations at Chester: Grosvenor Museum Archaeological Excavation and Survey Reports
Archaeology · Art · Excavation · Period (music) · Theme (computing) · World Wide Web · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |