Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Discovering the Senate's Fundamental Nature

Moving beyond the Supreme Court's 2014 Opinion

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7704878
AutoresGary William O'Brien (0000-0001-6805-8549, Parliament of Australia, autor de correspondencia)
Año2019
Volumen52
Número3
Páginas539-555
Fecha de publicación2019-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCanadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s000842391800104x
OpenAlexW2968448077
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas17

In the 2014 reference, the Supreme Court sought to discover the Senate's “essential nature” in order to determine what reforms parliament could legislate unilaterally. Making use of a classification model found in comparative and historical studies, the Court concluded that the Senate was a “complementary legislative body of sober second thought.” This article re-examines the Court's narrow definition of the Senate's perceived role and presents evidence that its essential characteristics are direct continuations of various pre-Confederation design principles. Limiting a description of its architecture to a single model that eclipses all other roles the Senate may play shifts the debate on Senate reform, which in the recent past has laid emphasis on resolving the conflict among the models embedded in the upper chamber's essential characteristics. The article concludes by reviewing previous constitutional initiatives that aimed at bringing those models more in tune with modern Canada and by making suggestions about how reform proposals could better succeed

Economics · Legislature · Limiting · Majority opinion · Order (exchange · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Supreme court · Law · Political Systems and Governance

  • Birds of a Feather? Loyalty and Partisanship in the Reformed Canadian Senate

    Open Access•Jason Vandenbeukel, Christopher Cochrane et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2021

  • Federalism and the role of the state

    Herman Bakvis•Federalism and the role of the…•1987

  • The Parliament of Canada

    C E S Franks•Parliament of Canada•1987

  • Bicameralism

    Open Access•George Tsebelis, John Money et al.•Bicameralism•1997

  • The Modern Senate of Canada 1925-1963

    Frank Kunz•Modern Senate of Canada 1925-1963•1965

  • Canada's Founding Debates

    Janet Ajzenstat, Paul Romney et al.•Canada's Founding Debates•2003

  • Political Unrest in Upper Canada, 1815-1836

    A L Dunham, Aileen Dunham•Political Unrest in Upper Canada,…•1963

  • Documents on the Confederation of British North America

    Generalfeldmarschall Browne, Janet Ajzenstat et al.•Documents on the Confederation of…•2009

  • The Capacity To Judge

    Jeffrey L Mcnairn, Jeffrey McNairn•Capacity to Judge•2000

  • The Government of Nova Scotia

    James Murray Beck•The Government of Nova Scotia•1957

  • The Canadian Founding

    Janet Ajzenstat•Canadian Founding•2007

  • Political Institutions

    J O Hertzler, Edward Mcchesney Sait•American Sociological Review•1939

  • The Territorial Role of Second Chambers

    Meg Russell•Journal of Legislative Studies•2001

  • Canadian Issues

    Douglas G Anglin, Robert M Clark•International Journal Canada s…•1961

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,2
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2021 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae