Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Solidarity through service

The role of the guild of IT service managers in the field of European (in)security

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7737533
AutoresEileen Murphy Maguire (0000-0001-6406-7691, Copenhagen Business School, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen12
Número1
Páginas18-32
Fecha de publicación2024-01-02
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCritical Studies on Security (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2162-4887 • E-ISSN: 2162-4909
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/21624887.2023.2278260
OpenAlexW4388797320
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas53

Critical research is highlighting how processes of (in)security are transformed by the participation of new agencies and actors, especially data managers and IT systems operators. Expanding analysis to account for these new agencies and actors requires engaging with their professional practices. I argue that these actors can be understood as a guild of IT service managers who operate under a logic of service and are not just another (in)securitising actor. To do so, I analyse the practices of operational management carried out by the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA). By organising its work in line with a logic of service, eu-LISA rationalises its seemingly contradictory relationship to the field of (in)security. Despite its active participation in the construction and maintenance of IT systems for border security, eu-LISA does not make sense of its work or role in terms of security. Rather, it views its work as distinct from but in support of that of professionals of (in)security. I characterise this relationship to the field as one of delimiting security. Identifying this relationship reframes the securitisation/desecuritisation dualism as a continuum, reflecting the increasing complexity of actors’ relationships to security

Asian studies · Business · China · Computer security · Guild · Political science · Politics · Solidarity · Computer Science · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Government, Law, and Information Management · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Public Administration

  • Governance, risk and dataveillance in the war on terror

    Open Access•Louise Amoore, Marieke De Goede•Crime Law and Social Change•2005

  • Practice tracing

    Open Access•Vincent Pouliot•Process Tracing•2014

  • The Oxford Handbook of International Security

    Alexandra Gheciu, William C Wohlforth•Oxford Handbook of International…•2018

  • The socio-genesis of a guild of 'digital technologies' justifying transnational interoperable databases in the name of security and border purposes

    D Bigo•International Journal of…•2020

  • The interoperability controversy or how to fail successfully

    D Bigo, Lina Ewert et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • The Theory-Generating Expert Interview

    Open Access•Alexander Bogner, Wolfgang Menz•Interviewing Experts•2009

  • The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies

    Pinar Bilgin, Pınar Bilgin et al.•The Routledge handbook of new…•2010

  • The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration

    Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, Ninna Nyberg Sørensen•Migration Industry and the…•2013

  • Security

    Barry Buzan, Ole Waever et al.•Security•1997

  • The Politics of Insecurity

    J Huysmans•Politics of Insecurity•2006

  • Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

    Open Access•Glenn A Bowen•Qualitative Research Journal•2009

  • Security and the democratic scene

    Open Access•Claudia Aradau•Journal of International…•2004

  • Science and securitization

    Open Access•Trine Villumsen Berling•Security Dialogue•2011

  • Questioning security devices

    Open Access•Anthony Amicelle, Claudia Aradau et al.•Security Dialogue•2015

  • Laboratizing the border

    Open Access•Mollie Bourne, Mike Bourne et al.•Security Dialogue•2015

  • Governing border security infrastructures

    Open Access•Georgios Glouftsios•Security Dialogue•2020

  • Eurodac in Times of Bigness

    Vassilis S Tsianos, Brigitta Kuster•Journal of Borderlands Studies•2016

  • Re-Framing Mobility and Identity Controls

    Sergio Carrera, Nicholas Hernanz•Journal of Borderlands Studies•2015

  • The Question of the Limit

    Open Access•J Huysmans•Millennium Journal of International…•1998

  • (De)securitisation dilemmas

    Open Access•J L Austin, Philippe Beaulieu-Brossard•Review of International Studies•2018

  • An inquiry into the digitisation of border and migration management

    Open Access•Georgios Glouftsios, Stephan Scheel•Third World Quarterly•2021

  • Securing with algorithms

    Open Access•Louise Amoore, Rita Raley•Security Dialogue•2016

  • Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies

    Open Access•Rebecca Adler-Nissen, Rebecca Adler‐nissen•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2015

  • Smartening border security in the European Union

    Open Access•Julien Jeandesboz•Security Dialogue•2016

  • Co‐Producing Security

    Open Access•Rocco Bellanova, Marieke De Goede•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2022

  • Security‐as‐Service in the Management of European Border Data Infrastructures

    Open Access•Eileen Murphy Maguire•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2024

  • Securitization and Risk at the EU Border

    Open Access•Andrew W Neal•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2009

  • Border security as practice

    Open Access•Karine Côté-Boucher, Federica Infantino et al.•Security Dialogue•2014

  • Security and Immigration

    Open Access•D Bigo•Alternatives Global Local Political•2002

  • The (in)securitization practices of the three universes of EU border control

    Open Access•D Bigo•Security Dialogue•2014

  • A Rawlsian account of de-securitisation

    Valentin Stoian•Critical Studies on Security•2020

  • Engagement all the way down

    Open Access•Marieke De Goede•Critical Studies on Security•2020

  • Security (studies) and the limits of critique

    Lerita M Coleman, Lara Montesinos Coleman et al.•Critical Studies on Security•2016

  • We were taken by surprise

    Matthias Leese•Critical Studies on Security•2015

  • Taking the trouble

    Rocco Bellanova, Katja Lindskov Jacobsen et al.•Critical Studies on Security•2020

  • Security, resilience and desecuritization

    Philippe Bourbeau, Juha A Vuori•Critical Studies on Security•2015

  • Between Infrastructural Experimentation and Collective Imagination

    Open Access•Paul Trauttmansdorff, U Felt•Science Technology & Human Values•2023

  • The (Big) Data-security assemblage

    Open Access•Claudia Aradau, Tobias Blanke•Big Data & Society•2015

  • Reconfiguring Desecuritization

    Stephan Scheel•Geopolitics•2022

  • Controlling the Schengen Information System (SIS II)

    Rocco Bellanova, Georgios Glouftsios•Geopolitics•2022

  • The Market for Force and Public Security

    Open Access•A Leander•Journal of Peace Research•2005

  • Security Beyond the State

    Open Access•R Abrahamsen, M C Williams•International Political Sociology•2009

  • Sociology of Transnational Guilds

    D Bigo•International Political Sociology•2016

  • Making Digital Surveillance Unacceptable? Security, Democracy, and the Political Sociology of Disputes

    Open Access•Claudia Aradau, Emma Mc Cluskey•International Political Sociology•2022

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae