Risk, Reward, and Scientific Ontology
Reply to Bryant, Psillos, and Slater
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7747223 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Anjan Chakravartty (0000-0002-5097-2217, University of Miami, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 60 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 43-63 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217320000311 |
| OpenAlex | W3185987757 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 14 |
Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology contends that ontological commitments associated with scientific inquiry are infused with philosophical commitments. Interpretations of scientific ontology involve (what I call) metaphysical inferences, and furthermore, there are different ways of making these inferences, on the basis of different but nonetheless rational epistemic stances. If correct, this problematizes any neat distinction between naturalized and other metaphysics, and dissolves any presumption of there being a uniquely correct answer to ontological questions connected to the sciences. In this paper, I consider some weighty challenges to these contentions by Amanda Bryant, Stathis Psillos, and Matthew Slater
Epistemology · Metaphysics · Ontology · Political science · Presumption · Scientific theory · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |