Apologising for Srebrenica
The declaration of the Serbian parliament, the European Union and the politics of compromise
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7754196 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jasna Dragović-Soso (0000-0001-9644-368X, Goldsmiths University of London, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 28 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 163-179 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | East European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2159-9165 • E-ISSN: 2159-9173 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21599165.2012.669731 |
| OpenAlex | W2001750837 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 16 |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
In March 2010, the Serbian parliament adopted a declaration on Srebrenica as a formal apology for the 1995 genocide committed by the Bosnian Serb Army and paramilitary units of Serbia's Ministry of Internal Affairs. The compromises necessary to pass the declaration – along with the opinions expressed in the parliamentary debate – show that this event was not a turning point in Serbia's process of confronting the past, but a confirmation of the country's deep ideological and political divisions. The declaration's principal aim was to satisfy the European Union's expectations and bolster Serbia's project of seeking EU membership. The EU's conditionality policy has thus been effective in achieving official gestures of atonement like the Srebrenica Declaration. However, the EU's approach also diverts from the long-term domestic process of value transformation and the building of a civic public culture to a narrow focus on short-term instrumental measures aimed foremost at satisfying external demands
Bosnian · Compromise · Declaration · European union · Genocide · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Serbian · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · European Union Policy and Governance · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Public Administration
Reconciliation in Global Context
Renationalizing Memory in the Post-Yugoslav Region
Unintended consequences
Overcoming History, Becoming European
Beyond Serb-Croat Apologies
Alternative calendars and memory work in Serbia
Are there ‘greener’ ways of doing transitional justice? Some reflections on Srebrenica, nature and memorialisation
The last ‘never again’? Srebrenica and the making of a memory imperative
Europeanization, Democratization, and Backsliding
Policing Memory in Bosnia
A cataclysm and its aftermath
A cataclysm and its aftermath
Can Patriots Be Critical after a Nationalist War? The Struggle Between Recognition and Marginalization of Dissenting Voices
Does National Identity Matter? Political Conditionality and the Crucial Case of Serbia's (Non‐)Co‐operation with the Icty
Examining the 'age of apology
The United Nations General Assembly Resolution on Srebrenica and the Struggle Against Genocide Denial
Saviours of the Nation’
The Transitional Apology
Watching War Crimes
Investigating Srebrenica
Guilt, Responsibility, and Denial
The Paradox of International Justice Compliance
Balancing International Justice in the Balkans
Serbia After the Criminal Past
Civil society and post-communist democratization
State Responsibility for Genocide
The Strange Story of the Bosnian Genocide Case
Accounting for Genocide
The Power of Apology and the Process of Historical Reconciliation
Coming to Terms with the Past
| Obras citantes distintas | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 14 |