In a UK sample, EMDR and other trauma therapists indicate beliefs in unconscious repression and dissociative amnesia
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7919982 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Pamela J Radcliffe (University of Portsmouth), Pamela Radcliffe (University of Portsmouth, autor de correspondencia), Lawrence Patihis (0000-0003-2870-8986, University of Portsmouth) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 33 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 542-565 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-05-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Memory (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2025.2498929 |
| PMID | 40350801 |
| OpenAlex | W4410311251 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 133 |
This study explored UK mental health professionals’ beliefs (N = 178) for autobiographical memory function for trauma in the context of adverse therapeutic outcomes, e.g., false memories. It captures novel data on controversial memory beliefs for unconscious repression, dissociative amnesia and dissociative identity disorder (DID). Study participants were mental health professionals and included non-trauma-focused, (n = 92), trauma-focused EMDR practitioners (n = 62) and (non-EMDR) trauma-focused practitioners (n = 24). Most study participants indicated some degree of belief in repression (>78%) and dissociative amnesia (>84%). EMDR and other trauma-focused practitioners showed elevated agreement for controversial memory notions. The EMDR practitioner group also showed more belief in the diagnostic validity of DID. New data on mental health professionals’ beliefs about the aetiology of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) was also captured. Most study participants “Somewhat agreed” or “Agreed” that “blocked out” trauma memories are causally related to dissociation and physical symptoms, e.g., PNES (>78%); EMDR practitioners showed the highest degree of agreement (91%). The impact of memory beliefs alongside EMDR theory and practice is considered in the context of adverse therapeutic outcomes, e.g., false or non-experienced memories. Recommendations are made for future research to mitigate against adverse health outcomes
Amnesia · Cognitive psychology · Dissociative · Psychoanalysis · Psychological repression · Psychotherapist · Unconscious mind · Clinical Psychology · Psychology · Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Traumatic Brain Injury Research
The Science of False Memory
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
The Body Keeps the Score
Gpower
Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm
Betrayal Trauma
Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse
Belief in Unconscious Repressed Memory Persists
Tilting at Windmills
The messy landscape of eye movements and false memories
Memory and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy
Recovered memories in psychotherapy
Judges and lawyers’ beliefs in repression and dissociative amnesia may imperil justice
Believing in dissociative amnesia relates to claiming it
Psychological Myths as Therapeutic Instructions in Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing
The trauma model of dissociation
Reappraising a Parent can Occur With Non-suggestive Questions
"Memory work" and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse
The reality of repressed memories
Recovered memory practices in Ireland
Dissociative identity disorder and the sociocognitive model
Multiple identity enactments and multiple personality disorder
Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |