Urban resilience, digital technologies, and the economic recovery of a city from the pandemic
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7984722 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yonghua Zou (0000-0001-8522-5425, School of Public Affairs Zhejiang University Hangzhou China, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 84 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 637-650 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-05-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/puar.13678 |
| OpenAlex | W4377942019 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 21 |
| Referencias citadas | 62 |
The COVID‐19 pandemic has devastated the world economy, which has made global economic recovery a considerable challenge. When a city experiences disasters, it needs to utilize innovative governance instruments, such as digital technologies, to foster economic recovery resilience. This article proposes a theoretical framework aimed at revealing the interconnection between digital technologies and economic recovery resilience, and it presents the case of Hangzhou, China, to illustrate this framework. This article finds that digital technologies can foster economic recovery resilience by sustaining a collaborative network during disasters. This article also reveals that government‐sponsored platforms, public‐private partnerships, and citizen coproduction are the underlying dynamics through which digital technologies build resilience. This article provides a nuanced understanding of how digital technologies might impact the theory and practice of economic recovery resilience in the digital era
Business · China · Coproduction · Digital economy · Disaster recovery · Economic growth · Economic recovery · Economics · Emerging technologies · Government (linguistics · Political science · Public relations · Resilience (materials science · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Regional resilience and development
An evidence-based framework for digital intelligence-enabled urban physical examination in pandemic prevention
From Digital Tools to Governance Infrastructure
How does technological innovation affect urban economic resilience? Evidence from 276 Chinese cities
Digital innovation across the publicness spectrum
Turning peril into opportunity
Artificial intelligence policy and urban resilience
Urban resilience assessment matrix considering spatiotemporal processes
Bridging Digital Divides
Is digital economy the driving force for improving the tourism economic resilience? Evidence from China
Urban resilience
Unpacking Resilience in Public Administration
Digital fix under state entrepreneurialism
Public data openness and urban resilience governance
Towards a more globally inclusive academic discussion on local government
Exploring sustainable urban governance
How is the urban built environment associated with commuting carbon emissions during the Covid-19 pandemic
Smart governance for affordable housing in China
How cities navigate crisis
Street‐level discretion, personal motives, and social embeddedness within public service ecosystems
How Illegitimate Tasks Inhibit Public Sector Employees' Innovative Work Behavior
Smart Interaction vs. Face-to-Face? Evidence from a Survey Experiment on Perceived Government Responsiveness in China
The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation
Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End?“Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and PracticeInteracting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern AfghanistanUrban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice?Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation?The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note
Urban Resilience and the Recovery of New Orleans
Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Does inter-municipal collaboration improve public service resilience? Evidence from local authorities in England
The Covid-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems
Confronting the big challenges of our time
From recovery resilience to transformative resilience
Neighbourhood governance during the Covid-19 lockdown in Hangzhou
Examining Resilience Across a Service Ecosystem under Crisis
Urban resilience
Smart technologies for fighting pandemics
Accelerating the development of smart city initiatives amidst the Covid-19 pandemic
Policy style, consistency and the effectiveness of the policy mix in China’s fight against Covid-19
Cross-Sector Emergency Information Networks on Social Media
From Sars to Covid-19
Fighting Covid ‐19 with Agility, Transparency, and Participation
Policy entrepreneurs and individuals
From “Need to Know” to “Need to Share”
Resilience in Emergency Management Research
Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities
Unprecedented Challenges, Familiar Paradoxes
Collaboration in crisis
Resilience Thinking
Disaster Resiliency of U.S. Local Governments
Coproducing Responses to Covid ‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations
Crisis Management in Hindsight
Being a Public Manager in Times of Crisis
The Third and Fatal Shock
Competence in virtual communication
Creating Public Value and Institutional Innovations across Boundaries
Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public‐Sector Organizational Networks
Emergency Management Research and Practice in Public Administration
Varieties of Participation in Public Services
Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology
Boundaries as Junctures
Modes of Network Governance
Collaborative resilience
Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction
Beyond Engagement and Participation
Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy
Resilience in Public Administration
Adaptive Capacity and Traps
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems
| Obras citantes distintas | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 7 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 21 |