Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Overestimation of Covid-19 Vaccination Coverage in Population Surveys Due to Social Desirability Bias

Results of an Experimental Methods Study in Germany

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8020535
AutoresFelix Wolter (0000-0002-0686-8527, University of Konstanz), Jochen Mayerl (0000-0002-4599-9976, Chemnitz University of Technology, autor de correspondencia), Henrik Kenneth Andersen (0000-0001-6842-5337, Chemnitz University of Technology), Theresa Wieland (0009-0007-1336-4830, University of Konstanz), Justus Junkermann (Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg)
Año2022
Volumen8
Fecha de publicación2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2378-0231 • E-ISSN: 2378-0231
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/23780231221094749
OpenAlexW4285114980
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14
Referencias citadas16

In Germany, studies have shown that official coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination coverage estimated using data collected directly from vaccination centers, hospitals, and physicians is lower than that calculated using surveys of the general population. Public debate has since centered on whether the official statistics are failing to capture the actual vaccination coverage. The authors argue that the topic of one’s COVID-19 vaccination status is sensitive in times of a pandemic and that estimates based on surveys are biased by social desirability. The authors investigate this conjecture using an experimental method called the item count technique, which provides respondents with the opportunity to answer in an anonymous setting. Estimates obtained using the item count technique are compared with those obtained using the conventional method of asking directly. Results show that social desirability bias leads some unvaccinated individuals to claim they are vaccinated. Conventional survey studies thus likely overestimate vaccination coverage because of misreporting by survey respondents

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Actuarial science · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Disease · Econometrics · Economics · Environmental health · Infectious disease (medical specialty · Non-response bias · Outbreak · Pandemic · Population · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Social desirability · Social desirability bias · Social distance · Sociology · Statistics · Survey methodology · Vaccination · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Demography · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Virology

  • Assessing Nonignorable Response

    Open Access•Melody Huang, Elwood Hartman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026

  • What do people really think about the RSV vaccine? Study of unsolicited text replies from adults over 60

    Open Access•E Susanne Blazek, Sarah Deedat et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • County-level barriers in the Covid-19 vaccine coverage index and their associations with willingness to receive the Covid-19 vaccine across racial/ethnic groups in the U.S

    Open Access•Jessica R Fernandez, Paula D Strassle et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Who Gets Vaccinated? Cognitive and Non‐Cognitive Predictors of Individual Behaviour in Pandemics

    Open Access•Mark A Andor, Thomas Bauer et al.•Oxford Bulletin of Economics and…•2025

  • Implicit discriminatory attitudes in surveys

    Open Access•Henrik Kenneth Andersen, Jochen Mayerl et al.•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • Evaluating self-reported vaccination hesitancy in mobile phone surveys in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Ryan Rego, Ryan T Rego et al.•Journal of Global Health•2025

  • Socioeconomic determinants and reasons for non-acceptance to vaccination recommendations during the 3rd - 5th waves of the Covid-19 pandemic in Hungary

    Open Access•Anna Sára Ligeti, Beatrix Oroszi et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Covid-19 vaccine intentions and attitudes in Black American emerging adults with asthma

    Open Access•Amy Hall, Amy Lee Hall et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Longitudinal social contact data analysis

    Open Access•Neilshan Loedy, Pietro Coletti et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • Prevalence estimates for Covid-19-related health behaviors based on the cheating detection triangular model

    Open Access•Shu-Hui Hsieh, Pier Francesco Perri et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Social Desirability Bias in Measures of Norm Violations and Compliance during the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Alexander Helbing, Ivar Krumpal•Socius Sociological Research for…•2025

  • Beyond the records

    Open Access•Yannick Markhof, Philip Wollburg et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2025

  • Vaccine rhetoric on social media and Covid-19 vaccine uptake rates

    Open Access•Victoria A Nelson, Victoria Nelson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • Populist Party Support and Covid-19 Vaccination

    Open Access•Alexander Patzina, Hans Dietrich et al.•KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für…•2025

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•1957

  • Combining List Experiment and Direct Question Estimates of Sensitive Behavior Prevalence

    Peter M Aronow, Alexander Coppock et al.•Journal of Survey Statistics and…•2015

  • Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys

    Open Access•Ivar Krumpal•Quality & Quantity•2013

  • Risk, Trust, and Flawed Assumptions

    Open Access•Omid V Ebrahimi, Miriam S Johnson et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Heikle Fragen in Interviews

    Open Access•Felix Wolter•Heikle Fragen in Interviews•2012

  • What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum

    Adam N Glynn, Adam Glynn•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • Sensitive Questions in Surveys

    Open Access•Ingmar Ehler, Felix Wolter et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Statistical Analysis of List Experiments

    Open Access•Graham Blair, Graeme Blair et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Sensitive questions in surveys

    Roger Tourangeau, Ting Yan•Psychological Bulletin•2007

  • When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias

    Open Access•Graham Blair, Alexander Coppock et al.•American Political Science Review•2020

  • A Meta-analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of the Item Count Technique Compared to Direct Questioning

    Open Access•Jiayuan Li, Wim Van Den Noortgate•Sociological Methods & Research•2022

Obras citantes distintas14
Citas por año4,67
Intervalo de citas2023 - 2026 (4)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 13
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae