Scenarios for embedding phosphorus recovery into the international regime through EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8022360 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Teodor Kalpakchiev (0000-0003-3473-0346, autor de correspondencia), Brent Jacobs (0000-0003-3147-341X), Julia Martin-Ortega (0000-0003-0002-6772), Markus Fraundorfer (0000-0002-5446-9635), Dana Cordell (0000-0001-5138-1569) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 10 |
| Páginas | 101504-101504 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-11-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Sustainable Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2666-1888 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101504 |
| OpenAlex | W7105853947 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 155 |
The EU’s demand for Phosphorus, an essential element for food security, is expected to increase with up to 148% in agriculture and be subject to increasing competition from technological sectors, where demand is expected to increase tenfold. Although the circular economy of wastewater is a recognized mitigation option and the United Nations Framework for Climate Change (UNFCCC) has called for research exploring these options, emerging recovery technologies are underreported in climate models. At the same time, a global coordination of phosphorus is missing. To address this gap, we engage in a three-stage Delphi-based qualitative scenario building based on the shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs) with fourteen phosphorus and carbon governance experts, through which we outline new framings and design features for EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) that can advance the recovery of phosphorus and associated resources from wastewater. Our results suggest that within a fossil-fuel reframing of CBAM in non-cooperative scenarios, the technological focus could be on biomethane through anaerobic digestion and within cooperative scenarios in the long-term – on biochar as a carbon removal technology. Within a competitiveness framing, primary phosphates could be prioritised for food security and the recovered - to value-added industries that can purchase it at a premium. Extending these measures through a development cooperation reframing and design features for CBAM (technological transfers and rebates for recycled content) can fill an innovation gap, advance the idea of a horizontal climate labelling of products and improve CBAM’s compliance with international law. We also assess the viability of backcasted policy measures (real-time environmental feedback and incorporation of recovery in United Nations Framework for Classification of Resources (UNFC
Climate change · Cognitive reframing · Competition (biology · Corporate governance · Food security · Global warming · Phosphorus · Sustainability · Phosphorus and nutrient management · Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics · Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Energy backcasting A proposed method of policy analysis
Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development
Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
The future of agricultural data-sharing policy in Europe
Global benefits of the international diffusion of carbon pricing policies
Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments
Consolidating backcasting
Designing Participatory Technology Assessments
Integrating the Delphi survey into scenario planning for China's renewable energy development strategy towards 2030
Backcasting — a framework for strategic planning
Contribution of circular economy strategies to climate change mitigation
The Economics of Border Carbon Adjustment
The nexus of geopolitics, decarbonization, and food security gives rise to distinct challenges across fertilizer supply chains
Nutrient transport from the Ganga–Brahmaputra–Meghna River system to the Bay of Bengal
Distributional consequences shape public support for the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism
Policy mixes for sustainable development pathways
A review of scenario planning
Phosphorus for Sustainable Development Goal target of doubling smallholder productivity
Food system resilience to phosphorus shortages on a telecoupled planet
Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism
Planetary boundaries’ — exploring the challenges for global environmental governance
Enacting biochar as a climate solution in Denmark
Weaponization of climate and environment crises
Designing policy robustness
Phosphorus demand for the 1970–2100 period
Exploring river nitrogen and phosphorus loading and export to global coastal waters in the Shared Socio-economic pathways
The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications
Future agricultural phosphorus demand according to the shared socioeconomic pathways
The roads ahead
Disparate history of transgressing planetary boundaries for nutrients
Barriers to trade in environmental goods
Stewardship to tackle global phosphorus inefficiency
Handling the phosphorus paradox in agriculture and natural ecosystems
Securing Compatibility of Carbon Border Adjustments With the Multilateral Climate and Trade Regimes
The critical role of history in scenario thinking
The reflective futures practitioner
Future subjunctive
Stakeholders’ preferences for the future of transport in Europe
The future in sustainability transitions - Interlinkages between the multi-level perspective and futures studies
Developing an abduction-based method for futures research
How to visualise futures studies concepts
Scenario planning meets frame analysis
Beyond use
Past and future of backcasting
Futures under glass
The scenario planning paradox
Argumentative Delphi Surveys
Reacting to the politicization of trade policy
The EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism
Anticipatory Learning for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience
The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |