Recovery from problem drug use

What can we learn from the sociologist Erving Goffman

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8046483
AutoresJoanne Neale (0000-0003-1502-5983, Oxford Brookes University), Sarah Nettleton (0000-0002-5184-2764, University of York), Lucy Pickering (0009-0007-2025-2124, Oxford Brookes University)
Año2010
Volumen18
Número1
Páginas3-9
Fecha de publicación2010-09-07
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDrugs Education Prevention and Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0968-7637 • E-ISSN: 1465-3370
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3109/09687631003705546
OpenAlexW2128457217
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas29
Referencias citadas25

In this commentary, we critically review the contribution of the sociologist Erving Goffman (1922–1982) to understanding recovery from problem drug use. Previous research has indicated that drug users have a 'spoiled identity' and must restore a 'normal' or 'unspoiled' identity in order to recover. This argument has been linked to Goffman's classic work Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity [1963, Harmondsworth: Penguin]. Despite its evident appeal, linking recovery to repairing a spoiled identity has a number of problems. These include the derogatory connotations of 'spoiled', and the fact that the 'momentary' spoiled identity that Goffman likely intended is easily lost to a more 'totalizing' spoiled identity, from which it can be difficult for individuals to escape. Given such shortcomings, we consider how Goffman's broader dramaturgical work might contribute to our understanding of recovery processes. Dramaturgy, which focuses on the performative aspects of selfhood and the relational and situational nature of identity, suggests ways that individuals can work on their identity (and recovery) projects without over-prioritizing abstinence. We suggest that dramaturgy is more useful than the notion of repairing a spoiled identity for understanding and facilitating recovery. Nonetheless, it has limitations and other sociological perspectives provide fertile ground for future debate

Argument (complex analysis · Dramaturgy · Performative utterance · Community Health and Development · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes