It’s a Match
Task Assignment in Human–Robot Collaboration Depends on Mind Perception
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8075809 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Eva Wiese (0000-0002-0322-1250, autor de correspondencia), Patrick P Weis (0000-0003-4586-1464, Technische Hochschule Ulm), Yochanan Bigman (0000-0002-0978-322X), Kyra Kapsaskis (0000-0003-2063-6156), Kurt Gray (0000-0001-5816-2676) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 14 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 141-148 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-03-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805 |
| Editorial | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12369-021-00771-z |
| OpenAlex | W3151959626 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 7 |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
Robots are becoming more available for workplace collaboration, but many questions remain. Are people actually willing to assign collaborative tasks to robots? And if so, exactly which tasks will they assign to what kinds of robots? Here we leverage psychological theories on person-job fit and mind perception to investigate task assignment in human–robot collaborative work. We propose that people will assign robots to jobs based on their “perceived mind,” and also that people will show predictable social biases in their collaboration decisions. In this study, participants performed an arithmetic (i.e., calculating differences) and a social (i.e., judging emotional states) task, either alone or by collaborating with one of two robots: an emotionally capable robot or an emotionally incapable robot. Decisions to collaborate (i.e., to assign the robots to generate the answer) rates were high across all trials, especially for tasks that participants found challenging (i.e., the arithmetic task). Collaboration was predicted by perceived robot-task fit, such that the emotional robot was assigned the social task. Interestingly, the arithmetic task was assigned more to the emotionally incapable robot, despite the emotionally capable robot being equally capable of computation. This is consistent with social biases (e.g., gender bias) in mind perception and person-job fit. The theoretical and practical implications of this work for HRI are being discussed.
Cognitive psychology · Human–computer interaction · Human–robot interaction · Leverage (statistics · Mobile robot · Perception · Robot · Robot control · Robotics · Social robot · Task (project management · Task Analysis · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Engineering · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Artificial Intelligence · Social Psychology
If machines outperform humans
When does “no” mean no? Insights from sex robots
Social offloading
Humans do not “play fair” with social robots
Using Structural Equation Modeling to Explore Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Expectations and Attitudes Towards Socially Assistive Humanoid Robots in Nursing and Care Routine
Machine Replacement
Do I still like myself? Human-robot collaboration entails emotional consequences
Feeling robots and human zombies
Causes and consequences of mind perception
Dimensions of Mind Perception
Group Composition and Decision Making
The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation
The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised Version
Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task
Machines and Mindlessness
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |