Might Kantian Contractualism Be the Supreme Principle of Morality
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8090584 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gideon Rosen (0000-0001-9284-1613, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2009 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 78-97 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2009-01-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ratio (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0034-0006 • E-ISSN: 1467-9329 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2008.00419.x |
| OpenAlex | W2067884452 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 11 |
According to Parfit, the best version of Kantian ethics takes as its central principle Kantian Contractualism: the thesis that everyone ought to follow the principles whose universal acceptance everyone could rationally will. This paper examines that thesis, identifies a class of annoying counterexamples, and suggests that when Kantian Contractualism is modified in response to these examples, the resulting principle is too complex and ad hoc to serve as the ‘supreme principle of morality
Contractualism · Epistemology · Kantian ethics · Law and economics · Morality · Political science · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Law · Philosophy
Parfit's Ethics
Parfit's Ethics
Wouldn't it be Nice? Moral Rules and Distant Worlds
The misapplication dilemma
What is morality
Solving the Ideal Worlds Problem
Some Question-Begging Objections to Rule Consequentialism
Maxim and Principle Contractualism
The ideal worlds objection
Does the Patterned View Avoid the Ideal Worlds Objection
Diagnosing ideal world objections
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,38 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |