Not All Robots are Evaluated Equally
The Impact of Morphological Features on Robots’ Assessment through Capability Attributions
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8090851 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Laura Kunold (0000-0002-1258-4192, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany, autor de correspondencia), Nikolai Bock (0000-0002-4668-9523, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany), Astrid Rosenthal-von der Pütten (0000-0002-2497-143X, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-31 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2573-9522 • E-ISSN: 2573-9522 |
| Editorial | Association for Computing Machinery (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1145/3549532 |
| OpenAlex | W4313402413 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
Favorable assessments of social robots are addressed in several research and development attempts because positive attitudes and intentions towards technology are regarded as a necessary prerequisite for usage. To predict a favorable evaluation, it is inevitable to understand the appraisal process and determine crucial variables that affect the evaluative and behavioral consequences of HRI. Robotic morphology has been identified as one of these variables. In the present work, we expand previous work by demonstrating that capability attributions associated with robots’ morphological features explain variations in evaluations. Based on two large picture-based online studies (Study 1, n = 673; Study 2, n = 586) we show that robots with similar morphological features (e.g., robots with arms and grippers) can be clustered along their assigned capabilities, and that these capabilities (e.g., to manipulate objects) explain evaluations of the robots in terms of acceptance and social attributes (i.e., warmth, competence, and discomfort). We discuss whether these initial assessments are relevant to live interactions and how our results can inform robot design
Affect (linguistics · Attribution · Competence (human resources · Human–computer interaction · Robot · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Artificial Intelligence · Communication · Social Psychology
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots
All robots are not created equal
A survey of socially interactive robots
Universal dimensions of social cognition
Communication of Emotion in Social Robots through Simple Head and Arm Movements
Stereotype Content
Robots Are Not All the Same
Comparing Robot Embodiments in a Guided Discovery Learning Interaction with Children
Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence
Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making
Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent
Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots׳ animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness
How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses
The benefit of being physically present
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |