Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Sufficient Reason

Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8091015
AutoresDaniel W Bromley (0000-0002-3592-7688, autor de correspondencia)
Año2010
Páginas256
Fecha de publicación2010-12-31
Open AccessSí
TipoBOOK
RevistaSufficient Reason (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditorialPrinceton University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1515/9781400832637
OpenAlexW4238919795
Open LibraryOL29047221M
ISBN9781400832637
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas46

In the standard analysis of economic institutions--which include social conventions, the working rules of an economy, and entitlement regimes (property relations)--economists invoke the same theories they use when analyzing individual behavior. In this profoundly innovative book, Daniel Bromley challenges these theories, arguing instead for "volitional pragmatism" as a plausible way of thinking about the evolution of economic institutions. Economies are always in the process of becoming. Here is a theory of how they become. Bromley argues that standard economic accounts see institutions as mere constraints on otherwise autonomous individual action. Some approaches to institutional economics--particularly the "new" institutional economics--suggest that economic institutions emerge spontaneously from the voluntary interaction of economic agents as they go about pursuing their best advantage. He suggests that this approach misses the central fact that economic institutions are the explicit and intended result of authoritative agents--legislators, judges, administrative officers, heads of states, village leaders--who volitionally decide upon working rules and entitlement regimes whose very purpose is to induce behaviors (and hence plausible outcomes) that constitute the sufficient reasons for the institutional arrangements they create. Bromley's approach avoids the prescriptive consequentialism of contemporary economics and asks, instead, that we see these emergent and evolving institutions as the reasons for the individual and aggregate behavior their very adoption anticipates. These hoped-for outcomes comprise sufficient reasons for new laws, judicial decrees, and administrative rulings, which then become instrumental to the realization of desired individual behaviors and thus aggregate outcomes

Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Economic policy · Economics · Institutional economics

  • Governing in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Ray Ison, Jason Alexandra et al.•Sustainability Science•2018

  • Environmental Governance as Stochastic Belief Updating

    Open Access•Daniel W Bromley•Conservation Ecology•2012

  • Institutional Misfits

    Open Access•Juha Hiedanpää•Conservation Ecology•2013

  • Practising interdisciplinarity in the interplay between disciplines

    Open Access•Vanesa Castán Broto, Maya Gislason et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2009

  • The art of the ‘common good’

    Open Access•Matti Salo, Sari Puustinen et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Pushing the boundaries of conventional forest policy research

    Open Access•Alain Fréchette, Nathalie Lewis•Forest Policy and Economics•2011

  • Unfolding the organised irresponsibility

    Open Access•Juha Hiedanpää, Juha Kotilainen et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2010

  • Understanding social innovation for the well-being of forest-dependent communities

    Open Access•Tatiana Kluvankova, Stanislava Brnkalakova et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Agrarian Philosophy and Ecological Ethics

    Open Access•Paul Β Thompson•Science and Engineering Ethics•2008

  • Moral Entrepreneurship

    Open Access•V M M Pompe, Vincent Pompe•Journal of Agricultural and…•2012

  • Linking action situations

    Open Access•Christian Kimmich•Ecological Economics•2013

  • Transferring Williamson's discriminating alignment to the analysis of environmental governance of social-ecological interdependence

    Open Access•Andreas Thiel, Christian Schleyer et al.•Ecological Economics•2016

  • Taking account of governance

    Open Access•Xiaoxi Wang, Anne Biewald et al.•Ecological Economics•2016

  • Volitional pragmatism

    Open Access•Daniel W Bromley•Ecological Economics•2008

  • Ecology and valuation

    Open Access•Bryan G Norton, Douglas S Noonan et al.•Ecological Economics•2007

  • Applying methodological pluralism to wildlife and the economy

    Open Access•Shekhar Kumar Niraj, Vikram Dayal et al.•Ecological Economics•2010

  • Environmental Governance – From Public to Private

    Open Access•Arild Vatn•Ecological Economics•2018

  • Environmental regulations and the problem of sustainability

    Open Access•Daniel W Bromley•Ecological Economics•2007

  • Sustainability as a Fair Bequest

    Open Access•Bernd Klauer, B Bartkowski et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Modeling the Relationship Between Pesticide Use and Farmers' Beliefs about Water Pollution in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Achille Augustin Diendéré, Achille Diendéré et al.•Ecological Economics•2018

  • Aldo Leopold’s unrealized proposals to rethink economics

    Open Access•Qi Feng Lin•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Can Financial Incentives Change Farmers' Motivations? An Agrarian System Approach to Development Pathways at the Nicaraguan Agricultural Frontier

    Open Access•Gert Van Hecken, Pierre Merlet et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Know, live and let live

    Open Access•Gabriela Sabau, Gabriela L Sabau•Ecological Economics•2010

  • The Rules-Boundaries-Behaviours (RBB) framework for farmers' adoption decisions of sustainable agricultural practices

    Open Access•Bente Castro Campos•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • Land Tenure and Tropical Forest Carbon Management

    Open Access•Lisa Naughton-Treves, Kelly J Wendland et al.•World Development•2013

  • Habit, custom, and power

    Open Access•Frederick J Zimmerman•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Institutional form (blueprints) and institutional function (process)

    Open Access•John Groenewegen•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Formalising property relations in the developing world

    Open Access•Daniel W Bromley•Land Use Policy•2009

  • Local democracy implications for coastal zone management—A case study in southern Norway

    Open Access•Katrine Soma, Arild Vatn•Land Use Policy•2009

  • Considering the multiple purposes of land in Zimbabwe's economic recovery

    Open Access•Charles Chavunduka, Charles M Chavunduka et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Impact of Agricultural Transition on Soil Protection in Ukraine

    Open Access•Nataliya Stupak•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Institutionalization of common land property in Portugal

    Luís Filipe Gomes Lopes, João Manuel R dos Santos Bento et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Can community-based land adjudication and registration improve household land tenure security? Evidence from Afghanistan

    Open Access•Ilia Murtazashvili, Jennifer Murtazashvili et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Climate, carbon, civil war and flexible boundaries

    Open Access•Charles Chavunduka, Daniel W Bromley•Land Use Policy•2011

  • A Narrative Policy Approach to Environmental Conservation

    Open Access•Ricky N Lawton, Murray A Rudd•AMBIO•2014

  • Neoliberalisation, rural land trusts and institutional blending

    Open Access•Ian Hodges, Ian D Hodge et al.•Geoforum•2012

  • Governing Complexity

    Open Access•Dustin Garrick, William Blomquist et al.•Governing Complexity•2019

  • Les communs comme infrastructure institutionnelle de l’économie marchande

    Open Access•Gilles Allaire•Revue de la régulation•2013

  • Landholder perceptions of biodiversity offsetting rights and responsibilities

    Open Access•R Plant, Laure‐Elise Ruoso•Ecosystems and People•2023

  • John R. Commons’s Two-Layered Theory of Reasonable Value

    Hiroyuki Uni•Journal of Economic Issues•2024

  • What does sustainability demand? An institutionalist analysis with applications to China

    Open Access•Rong Tan, Rumei Hu et al.•Journal of Chinese Governance•2021

  • Demand, Supply, and Sustainability

    Vladislav Valentinov•Society & Natural Resources•2015

  • Does the sequence of land reform and political reform matter? Evidence from state-building in Afghanistan

    Ilia Murtazashvili, Jennifer Murtazashvili et al.•Conflict Security and Development•2016

  • Dimensões Institucionais, Inovação e Transferência de Conhecimento

    Open Access•Hugo Pinto•e-cadernos CES•2009

  • Deliberação e Mudança Institucional

    Open Access•Ana Narciso Costa•e-cadernos CES•2009

  • Where is the backward Russian peasant? Evidence against the superiority of private farming, 1883-1913

    Michael Kopsidis, Katja Bruisch et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2015

Obras citantes distintas46
Citas por año2,42
Intervalo de citas2007 - 2024 (18)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 10
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae