Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

He said, she said

How third-party presence shapes infertility reporting in couples

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8238367
AutoresEster Lazzari (0000-0001-8789-4681, Vienna Institute of Demography), N Milewski (0000-0003-1272-8990, Federal Institute for Population Research), Jasmin Passet-Wittig (0000-0001-8572-4646, Federal Institute for Population Research)
Año2026
Volumen54
Páginas159-176
Fecha de publicación2026-01-28
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDemographic Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1435-9871 • E-ISSN: 2363-7064
EditorialMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.4054/demres.2026.54.6
OpenAlexW7125844612
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas18

BACKGROUNDEstimating infertility prevalence at the population level is challenging and little is known about the factors that influence how individuals report it. OBJECTIVEWe assess whether third-party presence, such as that of a partner, influences the likelihood of reporting infertility among a sample of heterosexual couples.We also examine the consistency of responses between partners interviewed separately and evaluate whether third-party presence increases agreement or disagreement within couples. METHODSUsing data from the 2019 Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, we apply descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to assess associations between third-party presence and (1) infertility reporting and (2) consistency of infertility reports between partners. RESULTSOverall, 10.1% of men and 16.1% of women reported infertility.When a third party actively influenced the interview, reported infertility increased to 16.7% among men and 21.4% among women.After adjustment for confounders, men interviewed in the presence of an influencing third party had more than twice the odds of reporting infertility, while women had 65% higher odds.Agreement on infertility between partners increased from 7.5% to 14.5% in men's interviews and from 7.1% to 13.7% in women's

Abortion · Infertility · MEDLINE · Population · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017†‡§

    Open Access•Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Gregory Dale Adamson et al.•Human Reproduction•2017

  • The experience of infertility

    Open Access•Arthur L Greil, Kathleen Slauson-Blevins et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2010

  • Interviewing When the Spouse Is Present

    Peter Hartmann•International Journal of Public…•1994

  • On Third Persons in the Interview Situation and Their Impact on Responses

    Karl-Heinz Reuband•International Journal of Public…•1992

  • The Impact of the Presence of Others on a Respondent's Answers to Questions

    Tom Smith, T W Smith•International Journal of Public…•1997

  • Unerwünschte Dritte beim Interview

    Karl-Heinz Reuband•Zeitschrift für Soziologie•1987

  • Interviewer- und Situationseffekte in Umfragen

    Wendy J Hoag, Klaus R Allerbeck•Zeitschrift für Soziologie•1981

  • The Validity of Survey Responses

    Barbara A Anderson, Brian D Silver•Social Forces•1987

  • Effects of Spouse Presence During the Interview on Survey Responses Concerning Marriage

    William S Aquilino•Public Opinion Quarterly•1993

  • She Said, He Said, They Said

    John F Zipp, Joann Toth•Public Opinion Quarterly•2002

  • The Effect of Spouse Presence on Appraisals of Emotional Support and Household Strain

    Melvin Pollner, Richard E Adams•Public Opinion Quarterly•1997

  • Interviewing Separately or as Couples? Considerations of Authenticity of Method

    Open Access•Bridget Taylor, Hilde De Vocht•Qualitative Health Research•2011

  • Sensitive questions in surveys

    Roger Tourangeau, Ting Yan•Psychological Bulletin•2007

  • A dyadic approach to the study of perceived subfecundity and contraceptive use

    Open Access•Ester Lazzari, Edith Gray et al.•Demographic Research•2022

  • And Then There Were Three

    Open Access•Hennie Boeije, H R Boeije•CAM•2004

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae