Broad consent under the GDPR

An optimistic perspective on a bright future

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8248641
AutoresDara Hallinan (0000-0002-1160-821X, FIZ Karlsruhe – Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen16
Número1
Páginas1-1
Fecha de publicación2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLife Sciences Society and Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2195-7819 • E-ISSN: 2195-7819
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s40504-019-0096-3
PMID31903508
OpenAlexW2997106421
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11
Referencias citadas17

Broad consent – the act of gaining one consent for multiple potential future research projects – sits at the core of much current genomic research practice. Since the 25th May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has applied as valid law concerning genomic research in the EU and now occupies a dominant position in the legal landscape. Yet, the position of the GDPR concerning broad consent has recently been cause for concern in the genomic research community. Whilst the text of the GDPR apparently supports the practice, recent jurisprudence contains language which is decidedly less positive. This article takes an in-depth look at the situation concerning broad consent under the GDPR and – despite the understandable concern flowing from recent jurisprudence – offers a positive outlook. This positive outlook is argued from three perspectives, each of which is significant in defining the current, and ongoing, legitimacy and utility of broad consent under the GDPR: the principled, the legal technical, and the practical

Alternative medicine · Business · Engineering ethics · Informed consent · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Political science · Sociology · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy