Just data? Solidarity and justice in data-driven medicine
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8248698 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Patrik Hummel (0000-0001-9668-0810, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, autor de correspondencia), Matthias Braun (0000-0002-6687-6027, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 16 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 8-8 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Life Sciences Society and Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2195-7819 • E-ISSN: 2195-7819 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s40504-020-00101-7 |
| PMID | 32839878 |
| OpenAlex | W3081400343 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 17 |
| Referencias citadas | 52 |
This paper argues that data-driven medicine gives rise to a particular normative challenge. Against the backdrop of a distinction between the good and the right , harnessing personal health data towards the development and refinement of data-driven medicine is to be welcomed from the perspective of the good . Enacting solidarity drives progress in research and clinical practice. At the same time, such acts of sharing could—especially considering current developments in big data and artificial intelligence—compromise the right by leading to injustices and affecting concrete modes of individual self-determination. In order to address this potential tension, two key elements for ethical reflection on data-driven medicine are proposed: the controllability of information flows, including technical infrastructures that are conducive towards controllability, and a paradigm shift towards output-orientation in governance and policy
Big data · Compromise · Corporate governance · Data sharing · Economic Justice · Economics · Engineering ethics · Law and economics · Management · Normative · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Solidarity · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine
Digitale Souveränität« als Kontrolle
Was heißt digitale Souveränität?
Towards an Ethics for the Healthcare Metaverse
How is “solidarity” understood in discussions about contact tracing apps? An overview
Towards trust-based governance of health data research
Epistemic solidarity in medicine and healthcare
Lost in translation? Conceptions of privacy and independence in the technical development of AI-based AAL
Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places
Meaningful Human Control over AI for Health? A Review
Healthcare and AI frontiers
Machine learning in healthcare and the methodological priority of epistemology over ethics
Data solidarity in feminist technology activism and innovation
Perspectives of patients and clinicians on big data and AI in health
Vulnerability in the shadows
Is solidarity a social determinant of health? Conceptual challenges in thinking about solidarity in health and healthcare
Individual benefits and collective challenges
Zwischen neuer Solidarität und Entsolidarisierung – Der Sozialstaat angesichts des digitalen Wandels
Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond
The Onlife Manifesto
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
A New Initiative on Precision Medicine
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Shared Decision Making
Zwang und Anerkennung
The Black Box Society
Ceremonial Gift‐Giving
Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research
Group Privacy
The Course of Recognition
A Right to Reasonable Inferences
From Individual to Group Privacy in Big Data Analytics
Questioning Big Data
Automating Inequality
Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self
The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions
The ethics of algorithms
Algorithmic governance
What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally
How the machine 'thinks
Patients-in-Waiting
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4,25 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 17 |