Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Transforming Residential Disability Services in Czechia Under Neoliberalism

Barriers, Tensions and Opportunities to Strengthen Rights-Based Social Work

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8249656
AutoresZuzana Broskevičová (0009-0006-1780-7945, University of Ostrava, autor de correspondencia), Alice Gojová (0000-0003-0656-6278, University of Ostrava)
Año2026
Volumen11
Número1
Páginas121-133
Fecha de publicación2026-02-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Human Rights and Social Work (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2365-1792 • E-ISSN: 2365-1792
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s41134-025-00426-3
OpenAlexW7127364160
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas35

This article examines the dynamics of deinstitutionalization of residential services for people with disabilities in the Czech Republic, focusing on barriers, tensions, and opportunities for social work to support disability rights. Deinstitutionalization, understood as the development of community-based services replacing large residential facilities, is analyzed across three interconnected levels: political, organizational, and everyday practice. Drawing on 62 semi-structured interviews with people with disabilities, social workers, activists, and regional representatives, complemented by field journals and analyzed using situational analysis, the study shows that at the political level, deinstitutionalization is constrained by fragile commitment, project-based funding, and neoliberal fiscal rationality. At the organizational level, competing care rationalities—paternalistic protection, neoliberal activation, and relational, person-centered practice—produce diverse interpretations of community-based services. At the everyday level, social workers navigate tensions between promoting independence and enforcing responsibility. Autonomy emerges as contested between competence-based and interdependence-oriented approaches. The article contributes to international debates on deinstitutionalization under neoliberalism and the role of social work. It emphasizes the need for political advocacy for systemic changes in disability services, the adoption of relational and rights-based frameworks of social work practice, and the recognition of interdependence as a way of rethinking autonomy. Such approaches can strengthen the rights of people with disabilities in post-socialist contexts, where deinstitutionalization remains an ongoing and uncertain process

Autonomy · Field (mathematics · Independence (probability theory · Neoliberalism (international relations · Politics · Situational ethics · Work (physics · Disability Rights and Representation · Down syndrome and intellectual disability research · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Social Work

  • Some Perspectives on Deinstitutionalization

    H Richard Lamb, Leona L Bachrach•Psychiatric Services•2001

  • Steppingstones in larger struggles. How can we combine colliding struggles in the care crisis

    Open Access•Bernadett Sebály•Deusto Journal of Human Rights•2023

  • Eats me alive

    Elizabeth Hendrix, Amanda Smith Barusch et al.•Social Work Education•2021

  • Achieving Disability Equality

    Open Access•Laufey Löve, Rannveig Traustadottir et al.•Social Inclusion•2018

  • Keywords, care and neoliberalism

    Paul Michael Garrett•Critical and Radical Social Work•2017

  • Personalisation and self-determination

    Bob Williams-Findlay•Critical and Radical Social Work•2015

  • Using Fraser’s model of ‘progressive neoliberalism’ to analyse deinstitutionalisation and community care

    Ian Cummins•Critical and Radical Social Work•2020

  • Living Well’ vs Neoliberal Social Welfare

    Jim Elder-Woodward•Ethics and Social Welfare•2014

  • Delayed deinstitutionalisation in post-socialism

    Darja Zaviršek•European Journal of Social Work•2017

  • Progress on deinstitutionalisation and the development of community living for persons with disabilities in Europe

    Jan Šiška, Julie Beadle‐Brown•Disability & Society•2022

  • Critique of deinstitutionalisation in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe

    Open Access•Teodor Mladenov, Gábor Petri•Disability & Society•2019

  • Autonomy in long‐term care

    Geraldine Boyle•Disability & Society•2008

  • Neoliberalism, postsocialism, disability

    Teodor Mladenov•Disability & Society•2015

  • Why we do not need a ‘stronger’ social model of disability

    Christopher A Riddle•Disability & Society•2020

  • Disability studies after the ontological turn

    Michael Feely•Disability & Society•2016

  • Neoliberal abandonment in disability housing provision

    Anne Power, Andrew Power et al.•Housing Studies•2019

  • Not just a new house”

    Open Access•Amanda Howard, Lou Johnston et al.•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2024

  • Challenging charitable oppression

    Open Access•Nicole Laurenne Browne•The British Journal of Social Work•2025

  • Social Work Is a Human Rights Profession

    Open Access•Susan Mapp, Susan C Mapp et al.•Social Work•2019

  • Practicing Human Rights in Social Work

    Open Access•David Androff•Journal of Human Rights and…•2018

  • Social Work and Human Rights—Linking Two Traditions of Human Rights in Social Work

    Open Access•Silvia Staub‐bernasconi•Journal of Human Rights and…•2016

  • Neoliberalism and Disability

    Open Access•Scott Yate, Scott Yates•Foucault Studies•2015

  • Between an Ethic of Care and an Ethic of Autonomy

    Laura Davy•Angelaki•2019

  • Disability, work, and welfare

    Open Access•Colin Barnes, Geof Mercer•Work Employment and Society•2005

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae