Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Rethinking the New Deal Court

The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8301688
AutoresPaul Kens (Texas State University, autor de correspondencia), Barry Cushman (Southwest Minnesota State University)
Año1998
Volumen42
Número4
Páginas458
Fecha de publicación1998-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of Legal History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-9319 • E-ISSN: 2161-797X
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/846068
OpenAlexW2138337826
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas29

Journal Article Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution Get access Cushman Barry, Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. xi, 320 pp. $55.00 (cloth). $24.95 (paper). Paul Kens Paul Kens Southwest Texas State University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 42, Issue 4, October 1998, Pages 458–459, https://doi.org/10.2307/846068 Published: 01 October 1998

Constitutional law · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Law

  • Retrospectives

    Open Access•Robert E Prasch•The Journal of Economic…•1999

  • The Role of Religion in the Defeat of the 1937 Court-Packing Plan

    Open Access•WILLIAM G ROSS•Journal of Law and Religion•2008

  • The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Stephen M Feldman•Law & Social Inquiry•2005

  • Paths to (de)centralization

    Open Access•Daniel Béland, Philip Rocco et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2017

  • A Switch in Time Saves Nine

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Benjamin A Kleinerman•Public Choice•2002

  • Reconsidering the Frankfurterian Paradigm

    Open Access•Edward A Purcell•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

  • Finding Pathways

    Open Access•Nicholas Weller, Jeb Barnes•Finding Pathways•2014

  • Counting Cases About Milk, Our "Most Nearly Perfect" Food, 1860-1940

    Open Access•Ronald F Wright, Paul Huck•Law & Society Review•2002

  • The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking

    Open Access•Stefanie A Lindquist, David E Klein et al.•Law & Society Review•2006

  • Progressivism and States’ Rights

    Sean Beienburg•American Political Thought•2019

  • Where Have You Gone, Sherman Minton? The Decline of the Short-Term Supreme Court Justice

    Justin Crowe, Christopher F Karpowitz•Perspectives on Politics•2007

  • The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism

    Jenny Pickerill, J Mitchell Pickerill et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2004

  • Thesupremecourt Inamericanpolitics

    Lawrence Baum•Annual Review of Political Science•2003

  • The Most Unjust Piece of Legislation”

    Open Access•John Thomas Mcguire•Journal of Policy History•2008

  • A Reevaluation of the New York Court of Appeals

    Open Access•Felice Batlan•Law & Social Inquiry•2002

  • Class Jurisprudes

    Open Access•Aaron Hall, Aaron R Hall•Law & Social Inquiry•2016

  • Reconsidering the Frankfurterian Paradigm

    Open Access•Edward A Purcell, Jr Edward A Purcell•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

  • Shall These Bones Live? Property, Pluralism, and the Constitution of Evangelical Reform

    Open Access•Kellen Funk•Law & Social Inquiry•2016

  • Lochner v. New York and the Challenge of Legal Historiography

    Open Access•Howard Schweber•Law & Social Inquiry•2014

  • From Public Interest to Private Rights

    Open Access•Laura Weinrib, Laura M Weinrib•Law & Social Inquiry•2009

  • Support Structures and Constitutional Change

    Open Access•Amanda Hollis‐brusky•Law & Social Inquiry•2011

  • What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Howard Gillman•Law & Social Inquiry•2001

  • The Vagrancy Law Challenge and the Vagaries of Legal Change

    Open Access•Laura Weinrib•Law & Social Inquiry•2018

  • The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Stephen M Feldman•Law & Social Inquiry•2005

  • Charles Evans Hughes and the Strange Death of Liberal America

    Open Access•James A Henretta•Law and History Review•2006

  • Protective Labor Legislation in the Courts

    Open Access•Claudio J Katz•Law and History Review•2013

  • An Informal and Limited Alliance”

    Open Access•Brett Curry, Brett W Curry et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Recovering the Political Constitution

    Open Access•George Thomas•The Review of Politics•2004

  • From the courts to the state legislatures

    John Thomas Mcguire, John Mcguire•Labor History•2004

Obras citantes distintas29
Citas por año1,07
Intervalo de citas1999 - 2019 (21)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 27
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae