Pacing emotional labour of qualitative research in an intractable conflict environment

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8360488
AutoresDilshaad Bundhoo (0000-0003-0262-9868, University of Gloucestershire), Kenneth Lynch (0000-0002-5296-2864, University of Gloucestershire, autor de correspondencia)
Año2021
Volumen53
Número1
Páginas47-55
Fecha de publicación2021-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaArea (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0004-0894 • E-ISSN: 1475-4762
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/area.12640
OpenAlexW3032340059
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas25

Qualitative field research in any type of terrain calls for a practice‐oriented reflection on the researcher's emotional labour management in relation to the context of the field before, during, and beyond data collection. Intractable conflict environments (ICE) are characterised by long‐running social crises still unresolved. This particularity makes such contexts risk‐prone in terms of unpredictable dangers and unexpected outcomes, hence, the requirement for thorough ethical evaluation of field research designs. Field researchers, often working on their own, are expected to safely make ethically sound decisions while gathering high‐quality data within complex social realities of which they are often socio‐culturally not savvy. This inevitably exacerbates the emotional burden on the researchers and makes fieldwork challenging. Although feminist geographers notably have significantly contributed to highlighting the social dynamics of fieldwork by initiating and deepening discussions of the emotional and ethical challenge, discussions have rarely gone beyond underlining the need for recognition of the field researchers' emotional labour. Despite academic consensus for reflexive analysis and field diary‐keeping, little has been discussed on how to systematically manage this effort during the research process. In this paper, building on the first author's PhD fieldwork experience in Israel and the West Bank area, we propose a paced field research organisation method – PFROM – which systematically accommodates time and space for the researcher's engagement with and detachment from the field research's intensity. Applying the concept of pacing – intentionally distributing focused attention in such a way that will reduce fatigue prior to the completion of a task – this framework systematically integrates reflexivity within research designs. The PFROM provides researchers with a tool applicable beyond intractable conflict contexts which has the potential to enhance their emotional labour management

Context (archaeology) · Emotional labor · Engineering ethics · Field (mathematics) · Political science · Process (computing) · Public relations · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Migration, Health and Trauma · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Psychology