Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Natural history in the physician's study

Jan Swammerdam (1637–1680), Steven Blankaart (1650–1705) and the ‘paperwork’ of observing insects

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8395484
AutoresSASKIA KLERK (Utrecht University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen53
Número4
Páginas497-525
Fecha de publicación2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe British Journal for the History of Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0007-0874 • E-ISSN: 1474-001X
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0007087420000436
OpenAlexW3096733435
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas53

While some seventeenth-century scholars promoted natural history as the basis of natural philosophy, they continued to debate how it should be written, about what and by whom. This look into the studios of two Amsterdam physicians, Jan Swammerdam (1637–80) and Steven Blankaart (1650–1705), explores natural history as a project in the making during the second half of the seventeenth century. Swammerdam and Blankaart approached natural history very differently, with different objectives, and relying on different traditions of handling specimens and organizing knowledge on paper, especially with regard to the way that individual observations might be generalized. These traditions varied from collating individual dissections into histories, writing both general and particular histories of plants and animals, collecting medical observations and applying inductive reasoning. Swammerdam identified the essential changes that insects underwent during their life cycle, described four orders based on these ‘general characteristics’ and presented his findings in specific histories that exemplified the ‘general rule’ of each order. Blankaart looked to the collective observations of amateurs to support his reputation as a man of medicine, but this was not supposed to lead to any kind of generalization. Their work alerts us to the variety of observational practices that were available to them, and with what purposes they made these their own

Archaeology · Epistemology · Generalization · Natural (archaeology · Natural history · Natural Philosophy · Order (exchange · Reputation · Social science · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Artificial Intelligence · Classics · Computer Science · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · History of Science and Natural History · Medicine · Philosophy

  • Visible Labour? Productive Forces and Imaginaries of Participation in European Insect Studies, ca. 1680–1810

    Open Access•Dominik Hünniger•Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschicht…•2021

  • Isaac Beeckman as a Reader of Francis Bacon's Sylva Sylvarum

    Open Access•Benedino Gemelli•Journal of Early Modern Studies•2013

  • The Science of Describing

    Brian W Ogilvie•Science of Describing•2006

  • Reading the Book of Nature in the Dutch Golden Age, 1575-1715

    Eric Jorink, Peter Mason•Reading the book of nature in the…•2010

  • Cartesian Empiricisms

    Open Access•Mihnea Dobre, Tammy Nyden•Cartesian Empiricisms•2013

  • Historia

    Gianna Pomata, Nancy G Siraisi•Historia•2005

  • Monstrosities from the Sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner's (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters

    Open Access•Sophia Hendrikx•Anthropozoologica•2018

  • Jan Swammerdam's frogs

    Charlotte Sleigh•Notes and Records the Royal…•2012

  • Sociable Knowledge

    Elizabeth Yale•Sociable Knowledge•2016

  • The Science of Describing

    William E Burns, William Burns•Sixteenth Century Journal•2007

  • The Scholar in His Study

    Maryanne Cline Horowitz•Sixteenth Century Journal•1998

  • The Scholar in his Study. Ownership and experience in Renaissance Italy

    A Macgregor•Journal of the History of…•1998

  • The Rise of Note‐Taking in Early Modern Europe

    Ann Blair•Intellectual History Review•2010

  • Seeing and Writing

    Paul Nelles•Intellectual History Review•2010

  • Ulisse Aldrovandi’s Pandechion Epistemonicon and the Use of Paper Technology in Renaissance Natural History

    Fabian Kraemer•Early Science and Medicine•2014

  • Francis Bacon

    Doina‐Cristina Rusu, Doina-Cristina Rusu•Early Science and Medicine•2012

  • Sauvages’ Paperwork

    Volker He, Volker Hess et al.•Early Science and Medicine•2014

  • Locke, Bacon and Natural History

    Peter R Anstey•Early Science and Medicine•2002

  • Sharing Cases

    Gianna Pomata•Early Science and Medicine•2010

  • Robert Boyle's 'Designe about Natural History

    Michael Hunter, Peter Anstey et al.•Early Science and Medicine•2008

  • Pump and Circumstance

    Open Access•Steven Shapin•Social Studies of Science•1984

  • Bacon in Holland

    Open Access•Benedino Gemelli•Journal of Early Modern Studies•2014

  • Renaissance and Revolution

    Pamela O Long, J V Field et al.•Technology and Culture•1995

  • Marginalia, commonplaces, and correspondence

    Open Access•Elizabeth Yale•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2011

  • Notebooks, English Virtuosi, and Early Modern Science

    Robert Yeo, Richard Yeo•Notebooks, English Virtuosi, and…•2014

  • Induction before Hume

    John R Milton•The British Journal for the…•1987

  • Robert Boyle and the early Royal Society

    Open Access•Michael Hunter•The British Journal for the…•2007

  • Picturing the Book of Nature

    Sachiko Kusukawa•Picturing the Book of Nature•2012

  • Regius's Fundamenta Physices

    Theo Verbeek•Journal of the History of Ideas•1994

  • Newton on the Beach

    Open Access•Simon Schaffer•History of Science•2009

  • The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England

    Steven Shapin•Isis•1988

  • Collecting Nature

    Bruno J Strasser•Osiris•2012

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,2
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2021 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae