Why the World Bank can't lead us to a just world order
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8415201 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Stephen R Shalom (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1995 |
| Volumen | 27 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 48-49 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1995-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1995.10413035 |
| OpenAlex | W2312547861 |
| Idioma | EN |
Gail Omvedt makes some telling points in her critique. Dependency theorists have been too quick to discount the possibility of capitalist development in the Third World. It is good to be reminded of the dangers of allowing wishful thinking to color our assessments of popular struggles, and it is useful to have our attention drawn to how elites often use populist rhetoric to mask their defense of power and privilege. In a number of respects, however, I find Omvedt's analysis flawed and even troubling
Dependency (UML · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Lead (geology · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Power (physics · Privilege (computing · Rhetoric · Sociology · Wishful thinking · World order · Computer Science · International Development and Aid · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |