Some Remarks On The Term “Aztec Empire”
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8870436 |
|---|---|
| Autores | R H Barlow (University of California, Berkeley, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1945 |
| Volumen | 1 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 345-349 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1945-01-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0003-1615 • E-ISSN: 1533-6247 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/978159 |
| OpenAlex | W2334476734 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
The enormous native state which Cortés overthrew August 13, 1521, is commonly called the Aztec Empire. This is true more of the English literature than of the Spanish, which sometimes prefers the half-correct “Imperio de los Mexicanos”. The writer has no quarrel with the word “Empire”, which has been questioned from time to time, but he does have with the word “Aztec” used in this connection. This originates, apparently, with Clavijero and was diffused by Prescott, a mere hundred years ago. The latter speaks initially of “the ancient Mexicans, or Aztecs as they were called” and after that uses “Aztec Empire” incessantly. This nomenclature, vulgarized through such dross as Bancroft, has swamped everything else. Nevertheless, neither Cortés nor Bernal Díaz nor Tápia, all actors in the Conquest, ever so much as mention the word “Aztec”, much less say “we conquered the Aztec Empire”. Nor does Sahagun in his encyclopedic work use the term “Aztec Empire”, nor does Motolinía. If it appears in any of these works, or anywhere among the first generation of conquerors and settlers, it is so subordinately mentioned that it has escaped the writer. Below we shall see what its conquerors did call the Empire they overthrew
Ancient history · Art · CONQUEST · Empire · Literature · State (computer science · Classics · History · Latin American history and culture · Mathematics
| Citas por año | 0,08 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citas | 1954 - 2025 (72) |
| Altamente citado | No |