Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Myths About Lincoln

Peeling the Onion

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8895902
AutoresDavid L Lightner (autor de correspondencia)
Año1991
Volumen22
Número3
Páginas441-456
Fecha de publicación1991-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCanadian Review of American Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0007-7720 • E-ISSN: 1710-114X
EditorialUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/cras-022-03-08
OpenAlexW2035304205
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas11

Waldo W. Braden, ed. Building the Myth: Selected Speeches Memorializing Abraham Lincoln. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990. vii + 259 pp. Mario M. Cuomo and Harold Holzer, eds. Lincoln on Democracy. New York, Harper Collins Publishers, 1990. xlvii + 416 pp. Robert W. Johannsen. Lincoln, the South, and Slavery. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1991. xiii + 128 pp. James M. McPherson. Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. xiii + 173 pp. Mark E. Neely Jr. The Fate of Liberty: Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. xvii + 278 pp. Louis A. Warren. Lincoln's Youth: Indiana Years, Seven to Twenty-one [1959]. Indianapolis: Indiana Historical Society, 1991. xxii + 298 pp. David Zarefsky. Lincoln, Douglas, and Slavery: In the Crucible of Public Debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. xiv + 309 pp. In his inaugural address in 1861, Abraham Lincoln appealed to Southerners to abandon secession, pointing out that even if the North and the South were to separate politically, they still would be joined geographically: Physically speaking we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other, nor build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced, and go out of the presence, and beyond the reach of each other; but the different parts of our country cannot do this. They cannot but remain face to face; and intercourse, either amicable or hostile, must continue between them. Is it possible then to make that intercourse more advantageous, or more satisfactory, after separation than before?Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws? Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends

Ancient history · Baton rouge · Battle · Democracy · Mythology · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Theology · Wife · American Constitutional Law and Politics · American History and Culture · Classics · History · Law · Mormonism, Religion, and History · Philosophy · Religious studies

  • The Blundering Generation

    J G Randall•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1940

  • Conflict and Compromise

    Paul D Escott, Roger L Ransom•The Journal of Southern History•1991

  • The Republican Party and the South, 1855-1877

    RICHARD LOWE, Richard H Abbott•The Journal of Southern History•1987

  • Lincoln Reconsidered

    Paul M Angle, David C Donald et al.•The Journal of Southern History•1956

  • Ballots for Freedom

    Lewis C Perry, Richard H Sewell•The Journal of Southern History•1977

  • Dynamics of Ascent

    Stuart Bruchey, W Elliot Brownlee•Journal of American History•1977

  • The Sources of Antislavery Constitutionalism in America, 1760-1848

    Kermit L Hall, William M Wiecek•American Journal of Legal History•1978

  • Patriotic Gore

    Open Access•Joe Lee Davis, Edmund Wilson•American Quarterly•1962

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae