Some Oversights in Dewey's Cosmopolitanism
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8903243 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Skrupskelis Skrupskelis (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2009 |
| Volumen | 45 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 308-308 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2009-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0009-1774 • E-ISSN: 1558-9587 |
| Editorial | Indiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2979/tra.2009.45.3.308 |
| OpenAlex | W2012661857 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 8 |
Dewey's critique of nationalism is primarily a critique of the ambitions of great powers. He was unaware of the aspirations of small nations, and his critique has less relevance for small-nation nationalism. In fact, as a communitarian, he should have been a supporter. But he also believed that science and technology are pushing mankind towards unity. The ideal society is to be cosmopolitan, democratic and secular, with everyone relying on the scientific method for beliefs. An American nationalist, he believed in America's special link with democracy, in her mission to lead mankind, and saw America as a model of cosmopolitanism. However, he never made clear whether he saw America as a melting pot forming a new nation or as a mosaic. As a result, the status of nationality in the cosmopolitan humanity of the future remains unclear
Cosmopolitanism · Political science · Politics · Law · Political theory and Gramsci · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Religious Education and Schools
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |