Recovery Colleges or Something Different? The Development and Evaluation of a Reflection Tool for Recovery Colleges in the Netherlands
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8909393 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Marloes van Wezel (0000-0002-8650-8053, Tilburg University, autor de correspondencia), C Muusse (0000-0003-1746-1236, Trimbos Institute), Jenny Boumans (0000-0002-2980-5959, Trimbos Institute), Dike Van De Mheen (0000-0002-7918-1523, Tilburg University), Hans Kroon (0000-0002-2259-1628, Tilburg University) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 62 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 231-244 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-10-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Community Mental Health Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0010-3853 • E-ISSN: 1573-2789 |
| Editorial | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10597-025-01517-1 |
| PMID | 41160334 |
| OpenAlex | W4415652792 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 33 |
Recovery Colleges (RCs) are increasingly implemented worldwide, with a fidelity measure recently developed in the United Kingdom (UK). However, RCs may vary based on their operating contexts. In the Netherlands, a key deviation is that RCs are often peer-run rather than co-produced with mental healthcare providers, as outlined in the fidelity measure. This study assessed the measure's suitability in the Dutch context, leading to the development of a reflection tool (Phase 1) which was subsequently evaluated (Phase 2). The development phase involved focus groups with peer facilitators and coordinators from 16 RCs (N = 29) to capture critical elements of Dutch RCs. The tool was piloted (N = 5) and evaluated more broadly (N = 24). The tool provided valuable insights, highlighting shared values among RCs internationally and conceptual differences between Dutch and UK models. The findings raised questions about the boundaries of fidelity in co-created contexts such as RCs
Critical reflection · Fidelity · Focus group · Mental health · Mental model · Phase (matter · Reflection (computer programming · Underpinning · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
The added value of inclusive research
Uses and abuses of recovery
Research co-design in health
On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
Doing Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Fidelity Criteria
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |